Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 September 17

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canadian Parliament illumination for the Queen.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Peter Ormond (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Appears to be the work of the Canadian government, which is not PD as far as I understand: https://twitter.com/senateca/status/1568037429721931776?s=46&t=5xfSlVia7LIBUthExTBCnw Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 00:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• They are not the same pictures. Peter Ormond 💬 05:30, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Peter Ormond You’re right, and thanks for pointing that out. But it does seem to be the same picture as the one posted by the Canadian government on Facebook at https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0PoYvRCXCdNRoe4u56kfsABLgyWBsSTVqdzZeVb1FThuRicpiNDBTmqyicYZvjHk1l&id=100064694346427. It’s the same angle, same color sky, same time on the clock, the flag waving the same way, but dated 4 days earlier than yours and a slight difference in cropping. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 10:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, then delete it. Actually I asked a friend to get me a free pic on my behalf; maybe he just fooled me. :( Peter Ormond 💬 10:57, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You asked a friend to find you a free image and then you licensed it as your own work? Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 22:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Ormond: Am I to take it that you are not the photographer of this image? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And are there other photos that the user didn't take that are marked "own work"? Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 15:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is an important question given the indef block of this user at Commons for deliberate flickrwashing. Whpq (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a copyright violation. Whpq (talk) 16:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siege Perilous (Once Upon a Time).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Elisfkc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not used educationally or critically, only used as ornamentation in an infobox. Fails WP:NFCC. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Will Smith dancing to "Gettin' Jiggy wit It".png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zeddawg (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free image is used to illustrate a minor item in the article on the slapping incident. The text already describes adequately what happened, and the image's removal would not really detract from a reader's understanding of the slapping incident. Fails WP:NFCC#1, and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 12:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boney M. - Ma Baker (Remix '93 (1993 single).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dreamer.se (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A cover art for one of original releases already suffices. I don't see how deleting a cover art of a 1993 remix of the original recording would affect the understanding of what can be already understood while reading the "Ma Baker" article. May fail WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Point and Figure Chart.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Avitya (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused screenshot of non-free software. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:10, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:03, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MultiVersus roster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Soulbust (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not add educational value to the article: there's already a piece of non-free media that shows off the art style, so this is fluff and not discussed critically. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:47, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The title page is sufficient. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:03, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I think the lineup of the roster is different than the cover art. The cover art also obscures everyone but Batman and Shaggy, so I think the lineup serves a purpose in displaying the characters. Soulbust (talk) 04:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Depending on the outcome of this DR on Wikimedia Commons (which this file is presumably sourced from (2:28 into the video)), this file may fail WP:NFCCP#1. (Oinkers42) (talk) 02:34, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.