Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 May 9

< May 8	May 10 >

May 9

File:Knock at the Cabin Poster.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a fan poster (proof). Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 13:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:¿Dónde Están Corazón? single cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Appears to be an unofficial/fan-made cover. No prejudice to restoration if someone can produce a reliable source proving otherwise. -FASTILY 02:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discogs is a user-generated site where anything including bootlegs and non-official releases can be uploaded by anyone. Not a reliable source ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 00:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lil-unique1: but it is the original single cover. You can see here too: link--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 17:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope- the listing says "promo single" a.k.a those sent to radio/press. See WP:SINGLE and Template:Infobox song where it says leaked copies, advance or limited promo releases to radio stations, etc., generally are not used. A typed sleeve for the "not for resale" copy of a song does not meet WP:NFCC which shows it should be for primary indenitification. The format of release was not widely available for the public or intended to be seen by the public. That's what such advance copies of a single are for. In fact if you check spotify, it shows that this is not the single cover. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 18:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not the album/single cover. Misleading info if we keep it. Buffs (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep majority of Spanish language songs, especially those released prior to the 2010s, were release as promo singles only to Latin radio stations only. Otherwise, we would have to delete a lot of cover arts for Spanish language singles and I don't see how that would be helpful. Erick (talk) 22:49, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Radin Mas Community Centre Mural1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in Singapore, needs evidence of permission from mural's author. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless a proper NFCC exception is noted AND it is used in an article. This image fails on two fronts. Buffs (talk) 13:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.