Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 June 20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Binhai Mass Transit Line 9.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ASDFGH (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, superseded by File:TJM Line 9 icon.svg on Commons. ✗plicit 14:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 02:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madamexdeluxe.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SomeWhatLife (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not notable for inclusion. This is used as an alternative cover for the deluxe edition of the album. It is not subject to extensive commentary which would warrant the addition of a second non-free cover in the article. It's omission is not detrimental to reader's understanding of the topic. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NFCC 3a. It contains information that is easily shown by the standard cover. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 00:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taipei-Win31.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rich Smith (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#8: There's no sourced commentary in the article about the game Taipei, thus the omission of this screenshot would not be detrimental to reader's understanding of the article topic. Wcam (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Habla Ahora Edicion Especial.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CarpeDiemBelieve (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Inclusion of a second non-free cover adds nothing to reader's understanding of the topic and could be easily explained in words. It's omission is not detrimental to the understanding of the topic. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:59, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dnr logo color.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chem8700 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Logo is possibly in public domain. Although c:COM:TOO US states that simple outline maps do not meet the ToO, previous discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 February 23#File:Parti Berjaya Logo.svg suggests otherwise. Putting it here for discussion. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicense consists of simple state outline, text and geometric shapes; concur this is fine under c:COM:TOO US. Partu Berjaya Logo was a different situation because in the context of a source from Malaysia, c:COM:TOO Malaysia is uncertain (likely low threshold). — 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 15:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:GOT-7x03-JonDaenerys.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Askarion (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This TV episode screen shot is stated to be used for "demonstrating an aesthetically or narratively significant moment" with a description claiming "The scene received acclaim from critics". The scene is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. The only possible text associated with the scene is a Rotten Tomatoes blurb, ""The Queens Justice" saw the much-anticipated meeting between Jon Snow and Daenerys Targaryen -- but had much larger surprises in store before its shocking end." Fails WP:NFCC#8 .Whpq (talk) 23:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Nom. Unnecessary inclusion that provides no unique context. Fails NFCC 8. ColSol (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.