Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 September 29

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status, and available on external websites where it is marked copyrighted. No prejudice to restoration if permission is clarified on-wiki or via VRT. -FASTILY 06:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lake in Skrivena Luka.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Luka Jačov (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

ticket:2006070410010191 only gives permission for distribution and does not release the work into the public domain. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Also see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kuzma.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 05:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• This is tricky. The ticket also say that "It is my wish to promote Lastovo Island as much as possible." but it does not meet the standards required in 2021. The copyright holder got a link to the file on Wikipedia so it was clear to copyright holder how it was licensed on Wikipedia and there was no protests. So I think the copyright holder was/is happy about the way the file was licenses. Per c:Template:Grandfathered old file and practice on Commons we do not delete files when standard for permissions change. So depending on how strict we should judge old permissions I think we could chose to keep but I think in that case {{Copyrighted free use}} would probably be a better license. --MGA73 (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: The uploader last edited English Wikipedia in August 2020: so, not sure if they will respond to any messages left on their user talk page. If they don't respond here, there perhaps we're left to following the advice given in the second paragraph of c:COM:GRANDFATHER#How to deal with old files. Given how long ago the file was uploaded, it's probably currently being used on some websites that may have gotten the file from Wikipedia: this might be one of them. While it might be best to assume good faith here unless it can be shown that the photo was being used somewhere prior to Commons under a different license or perhaps the photo can be found somewhere along with more information about its provenance that differs from the information provided by the uploader, there are some concerns that I think need to be addressed. Although the source that was provided for the photo seems to no longer using the image, the url has archived versions dating back to 2000. A July 2006 archived version clearly has a copyright notice at the bottom of the page which cannot really just be ignored for the sake of AGF with respect to the uploader. Unlike JJMC89 and MGA73, I'm not a VRT volunteer and might be missing something here, but the copyright notice is a concern and such a thing might be how this needs to be decided unless the uploader or someone else can provide further clarification. Regardless, if consensus is to "keep" this, then it should be moved to Commons since there's no reason for it to remain a local file on English Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Bs from the Beth B and Scott B, Black Box and G-Man, Flyer, 1978.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Valueyou (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free image of still-living persons being used for primary identification purposes in Scott B and Beth B which fails WP:NFCC#1 in my opinion. Although the two individuals in the image no longer seem to be active collaborators and their appearances might have changed quite a bit over the years, they seem to be more Wikipedia notable for the films they made as collaborators than as to how they appeared at the time; so, it's hard to find any good justification for this file's non-free use per item 1 of WP:NFC#UUI. Since there both still living it's not entirely unreasonable to expect that a new free equivalent image of them individually or together could be created, but there might also be a free equivalent image of them from back in the day that can be found. In eoither case, it doesn't appear this non-free image itself was the subject of any sourced critical commentary or that the physical appearance of the two was the source of critical commentary, which means that this image's non-free use is not jusifiable per WP:FREER and not much encyclopedic information is going to be lost by omitting it per WP:NFC#CS. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carmean.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Craigcarmean (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File:Carmean patton.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Craigcarmean (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic use. Additonally, the uploader is the subject in the photo, requires WP:VRT permission from the original photographer(s). ✗plicit 06:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 08:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adebowale.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Clickunix (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗plicit 07:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 08:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akaashe.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bigen182 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious own-work claim. This file was uploaded to Wikipedia in 2009, but has been available here since 2003. The uploader is indefinitely blocked for repeated copyright violations. ✗plicit 07:20, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:DLF IPL.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sanjida Tanaka (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Violates WP:GETTY's point 14. Clog Wolf _Howl 08:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skenelogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kevv10 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, no foreseeable use. Skene House HotelSuites was deleted as A7+G11. Stefan2 (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 08:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ATEENSCantHelpFallingInLove.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benjichilders (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This cover art identifies different recording of "Can't Help Falling in Love" by the A-Teens. The A-Teens recording has existed, performed modestly in a few international music charts, was featured in a movie soundtrack, and has had two music videos. I'm unconvinced that deleting this cover art would affect the understanding of the song originally sung and popularized by Elvis Presley, of the song's notability, and of the recording's notability. I'm also unconvinced that the cover art is necessary especially for further understanding. Furthermore, it's not as free as the UB40 cover art (File:(I Can't Help) Falling in Love with You by UB40 CD edition.jpg); well, not fully free. There's already free text content for readers to learn more about the song and its different versions, including the A-Teens one. There's already a cover art of the original Elvis Presley single, even when it's fully physically different from the A-Teens one. I believe that the A-Teens cover art would fail WP:NFCC#8 and/or WP:NFCC#3a. George Ho (talk) 23:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Labelle-ladymarmalade.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FuriousFreddy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is a Portuguese single release of "Lady Marmalade" (45cat discogs). I uploaded the (other) US vinyl side label as intended replacement. The cover art was de-PRODded without rationale, so I'm taking it here. I'm unconvinced that a picture sleeve like the Portugal one is necessary. Furthermore, until I added a caption recently, the picture sleeve was assumed to be either used worldwide or part of US single release. I don't believe that the cover art complies with WP:NFCC#8 and/or WP:NFCC#3a. There are free images of Labelle at this time in case that this image is deleted. George Ho (talk) 23:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lady Marmalade by Labelle US single side A.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by George Ho (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I uploaded the image as non-free but also as intended replacement of an overseas picture sleeve. Indeed, I was uncertain whether it is either eligible or not for US copyright protection. The round shape with wavy/scalloped edges looks unusual to me. However, other 1970s Epic Records side labels similar to this without the specific shape are ineligible for US copyright due to plain background, plain lines, a 1970s logo with simple shapes and plain typeface, and factual info about recordings. If the round shape and the rest of the image are ineligible for copyright, then let's transfer the image to Commons. George Ho (talk) 23:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC); edited, 23:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To prove that it's part of US single release, discogs, 45cat, and eBay provide photos of the release. George Ho (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.