Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 July 9

< July 8	July 10 >

July 9

File:Ruth Prawer Jhabvala.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First, I just replaced it with a free image in its article. Second, the description says ... and has always said, this isn't recent vandalism ... "this historically notable individual and his drag persona." What? GRuban (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Actress Salla Lintonen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete LittleRydings (talk) 00:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC) Obsolete– The file has been replaced by a better version. New file name: SallaLINTONEN P 01.jpg[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Salla Lintonen, actress.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete LittleRydings (talk) 00:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC) Obsolete– The file has been replaced by a better version. New file name: SallaLINTONEN P 01.jpg[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uploads of Mahesh Chalaune007

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 14:15, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo(s) of non-contributor. Out of scope. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahesh Chalaune.jpg used at User:Mahesh Chalaune007/sandbox which will be G13-eligible soon. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:21, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Execution of Nguyễn Văn Lém.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete, with no prejudice to restoration for a history merge. History merging should be requested at the appropriate venue, I have not done that here because it is (IMO) out of scope for FfD. -FASTILY 02:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by File:Execution of Nguyen Van Lem.jpg. Considering that this file has 100+ revisions, I'd suggest merging them instead. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:H3h3Productions logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a picture available that can be used in its place to identify the subject in question. I also doubt that the channel icon is the primary means of identification of the subject as the actual YouTube channel is only discussed relatively briefly and the subject's notability extends far beyond the YouTube channel. I also believe that it does not meet the threshold of originality as a free version of the image could easily be recreated using plain text and shapes. Throast (talk) 21:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The title of the article suggests that the main subject is h3h3Productions, not Ethan Klein. --Thibaut (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

True, though I would look at the article body to assess which image is best suited to identify the subject. The article is focused primarily on Ethan and Hila Klein and events they have been involved in rather than the YouTube channel by itself. This might be an issue with the article that could be resolved separately. The latter arguments I provided above do weigh heavier in my opinion. Throast (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.