Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 July 17

< July 16	July 18 >

July 17

File:BRD Tower Timisoara.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This and all other files by user Mariusmati, now blocked due to copyright violations, are problematic. Varying resolutions and missing or inconsistent metadata (with different camera brands and models). I suspect not all of them are uploader's self-photographed images but might be from his acquaintances or just taken elsewhere. These make the files suspicious and unworthy for transfer to Commons, whether de minimis applies or not. See also Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 July 15#File:Traffic in Timisoara...jpg (taken via HP PhotoSmart C945 (V01.60)), Whpq's input on my talk page, c:File:Night panorama of Timisoara.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note the metadata of the photo in question shows "BenQ" (DC C50).

Other files by Mariusmiti

File:Spring in Timisoara.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Flood in timisoara.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) - SONY DSC-P100

File:Autumn(fall) in Timisoara.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) - HP Scanjet G3010

File:Fructus Tower Timisoara.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) - Panasonic DMC-FX7

File:Timisoara vedere aeriana.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:View over the city Timisoara..jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) - Canon EOS 300D DIGITAL

File:Iarna in Timisoara..jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - The claims of own work are not credible given the uploader's history of copyright violations and mish mash of EXIF, camera, and resolutions. -- Whpq (talk) 13:27, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Replaced one instance of the Fructus Tower usage with an image from Commons. All images are now unused. As nominator pointed out, not eligible for transfer to commons. --Elephanthunter (talk) 22:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Elephanthunter: note that Romania has no Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama, which means you must copy that Commons file to here locally and append {{FoP-USonly}} tag. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MtMatutum.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable uploader (Rayetan). See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rayetan for the reason. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not used, and not eligible for transfer to Commons due to linked discussion. --Elephanthunter (talk) 22:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LandanRiverPol.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable uploader (Rayetan). See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rayetan for the reason. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:55, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused. I would have recommended transferring it to Commons, except the outcome of the discussion on Commons was to delete this user's images. --Elephanthunter (talk) 22:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Acharya Gopi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own-work claim. Can be found on the cover of a book published in 2010 and in this news article from 2012. ✗plicit 10:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Uploader inferred that Gopi is the copyright holder, which means the CC license needs OTRS verification. Updating to fair use not possible given WP:NFC#UUI. --Elephanthunter (talk) 19:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2012 Summer Olympics logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, seems to be the official version -FASTILY 22:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The listed source of the svg image points to a raster image thus this image is likely not an official vectorization and should not be used per Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Multiple_restrictions. Wcam (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The image and source was changed by 52pd on July 17. Old source was http://www.london2012.com/documents/oda-planning/planning-update-stadium-and-aquatics.pdf (archived version). The only change is color, which, in my opinion, should be okay. If not, a simple change to the exact logo in the pdf would suffice. — Pbrks (talk) 19:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Since the image source was determined to be a vector from the London 2012 Olympics group themselves, and 52pd's only change was to color match a different version of the same logo, it's not a substantially original work in the eyes of the law. The text in Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Multiple_restrictions only attempts to mitigate the issues surrounding potential original works that come about when an image is initially vectorized. --Elephanthunter (talk) 20:42, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.