Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 April 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 April 17. ✗plicit 13:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:All The Small Things.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 May 10. FASTILY 23:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eh, Eh (Nothing Else I Can Say) by Lady Gaga alternative cover.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Persian.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Madjidmad (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused collage, and I wonder about the copyright status of some of the files included here (chiefly the recent photos) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth. -FASTILY 22:28, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:1961 slip n slide ad.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Editoneer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This advertisement is licensed as public domain and also declared to be used as non-free content. It's either one or the other. The public domain claim of being published in the US between 1926 and 1963 without renewal of copyright but no evidence for this has been provided. Note that the advertisement does carry a copyright notice. The claim for use as non-free content fails WP:NFCC#8 as there is no significant sourced commentary about this advertisement. Whpq (talk) 17:27, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I apologize, I wronged some things and I'll just repair the mistakes. I considered it's okay to use the 1926-1963 license considering there's lack of any renewal of copyright regarding this advertisement, guessing this isn't proof enough, so I concede to that point. After the discussion is closed I will replace the license with Template:Non-free use rationale, as it's not renewable -- it's not even on Wham-O's official site -- and the other criteria matches and about WP:NFCC#8, there is, actually, significant sourced commentary, but I only put it on the Slip 'N Slide article (via file with caption) and I understand the confusion.

Now my last concern is, I'm observing that I didn't capitalize "Slip 'N Slide" properly and also the fact I didn't put an apostrophe in the title of the file, and yes, it matters. Thank you for your concerns and I once again apologize for the inconvenience, thank you for not flat out speedy deleting it. Editoneer (talk) 19:20, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fawn Rogers I love you and that makes me god Times Square.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Paige Greco (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

derivative of non-free content (signage in Times Square), there is no FOP for 2D/3D works in the US FASTILY 21:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no permission from the artist, no FOP per Fastily. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fawn Rogers SUBJECT Install Moah.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Paige Greco (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File:Fawn Rogers SUBJECT Installation.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Paige Greco (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Art installation of some sort, and possible derivative of non-free content. It's not entirely clear where this is installed (or if it's still there), which makes it difficult to assess FOP FASTILY 21:27, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:11, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no permission from the artist(s), licence dubious (at best); the same image clumsily edited is here/here.Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fawn Rogers VIsible Light triptych.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Paige Greco (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

scanned artwork (recently created) of a notable individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 21:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no permission from the artist, apparently copied from here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:17, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.