Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 November 27

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Call of the Wild (Saturday Evening Post).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Victoriaearle (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, low-res, superior version available: File:1903 06 20 Call-of-the-Wild-Sat-Eve-Post-Cover.jpg FASTILY 06:45, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now because I'm certain the color in the "unused, low-res" version is faithful to the original, (see e.g here or here), and it was the one originally chosen to be in the article, (here) and in fact referenced in a source. The "superior version available: File:1903 06 20 Call-of-the-Wild-Sat-Eve-Post-Cover.jpg" seems to me too bleached, though it's a good resolution. I've been temporarily inactive because of health reasons and would like a bit of time to research and replace this version with a higher res one, rather than summarily delete. Victoria (tk) 13:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I've moved the file to Commons. Given that Wikipedia is not a webhost for unused files, I still think the local copy should be deleted -FASTILY 03:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can't we just keep this file entry & overwrite the low-res image with one of the higher res images? I'll do it as soon as I can get to it; the entire article has been hit hard recently & needs an overhaul & am trying to get to it. Victoria (tk) 04:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 09:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rags to Riches at Belmont Park2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Montanabw (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused low-res crop of File:Rags to Riches Horse at Belmont Park.JPG. No obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the full photo, the horse is barely visible. The detail focuses on the horse. “Low res” is not adequate justification to remove an image. Montanabw^(talk) 01:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"In the full photo, the horse is barely visible. The detail focuses on the horse."

The horse is partially blocked by a person and the image is of such low resolution that it could literally be any random horse in the picture; a casual reader would be unlikely able to tell the difference.

"“Low res” is not adequate justification to remove an image"

Fake news. Read the box at the top of Wikipedia:Files for discussion. -FASTILY 04:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 07:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Serves no value. ~riley (talk) 00:22, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.