Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 February 23

< February 22	February 24 >

February 23

File:GilgitCollapse1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete sourcing and incorrect licensing. This is declared to be public domain, but some of the source files are CC-BY-SA 4.0 so the license is incorrect. That is a fixable issue. However, there are six images in this collage and only four source image links provided. And of the provided sources, File:Baltit fort, Hunza Valley.jpg doesn't actually appear in the collage. There is insufficient sourcing to verify or fix the licensing for this collage. Whpq (talk) 03:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unless full evidence of all images being fee can be supplied. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr. Rajesh Arora.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Personal image for deleted WP:FAKEARTICLE. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aaevp-think positively.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aaevp-think positively.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pei plan galleria.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pei plan galleria.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coal Creek Reservoir No. 1 Plymouth, Pennsylvania 1928.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Coal Creek Water Dam Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coal Creek Reservoir No.2 Plymouth,Pennsylvania.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Coal Creek Water Dam Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coal Creek Water Dam No.3 Plymouth, Pennsylvania.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Coal Creek Water Dam Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coal Creek Water Dam No.4 Plymouth, Pennsylvania.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Coal Creek Water Dam Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bradley Central old building 1916-72.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bradley Central old building 1916-72.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Billy Two Rivers Mohawk Wrestler 1966 Cigarette Or Trade Card Ebay.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 March 3. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billy Two Rivers Mohawk Wrestler 1966 Cigarette Or Trade Card Ebay.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Party Games (Yes, Minister).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:23, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not used for any educational purpose. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elaeagnus x ebbingei.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

already on commons, unused locally, no reason to retain local copy per WP:NOTWEBHOST FASTILY 06:20, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 06:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The whole point of {{keep local}} is to keep a local version when there is also a Commons version. Based on the three deletion discussions that have kept the template, there is clear consensus for its existence and for its use for the purpose that it is being used for on this file. WP:NOTWEBHOST doesn't apply because the image was not uploaded for any kind of personal use and has no personal value - it was uploaded solely for it's potential use on Wikipedia. MikeParker (talk) 12:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Please do yourself a favor and actually read WP:NOTWEBHOST before making blatantly incorrect declarations about policy; {{Keep local}} does not magically immunize unused images from deletion, hence this discussion. -FASTILY 21:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's redundant. No good reason to keep a local copy has been presented. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No proper source is provided. The provided source is the Malaysian wikipedia, but the image there has no source given. The Malaysian wikipedia claims the image is PD but with no explanation as to why and with no source to verify. The copy here on the English wikipedia doe snot address the problem of the original source. Whpq (talk) 13:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Russell Surasky.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Russell Surasky.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spotted Dove.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image has a watermark that is similar to but not the same as the uploader's previous username (ArghyaIndian). The uploader has not uploaded any other images with this camera, and their other images (that don't have copyright issues of their own) were taken with a smartphone camera. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.