Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 December 23

< December 22	December 24 >

December 23

File:Baumgardner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An image found at Flickr with the Creative Commons "Public Domain Mark". It is not clear whether the copyright holder has actually released the image into the public domain. See c:Template:Flickr-public domain mark. Wikiacc (¶) 05:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I agree with the above statement. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 23:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Memorial to the slain officers of Berkut.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion under criterion WP:CSD#F3 by @Whpq. FASTILY 06:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need someone who can read Russian to verify the usage permissions Heptor (talk) 11:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the permission only provides for reproduction of the image and does not extend any permissions for derivative works. -- Whpq (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

comment It is true that the existing license does not explicitly permit derivative works. Is this a non-avoidable criteria for wikipedia? The license is otherwise very permissive. They probably just forgot to mention derivative works, to the extend it’s even a thing in their native jurisdiction. Heptor (talk) 00:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Suraj soundtrack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another non-free image already in use in the article Suraj (1966 film) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:22, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.