Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 April 1
April 1
File:Walter+Fly.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Walter+Fly.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sid ag (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
There is no educational purpose to this image, fails WP:NFCC #8. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Breaking Bad - Ozymandias desert scene.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Breaking Bad - Ozymandias desert scene.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AndrewOne (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
There is no educational purpose to this image, fails WP:NFCC #8. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:48, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Spr show 09.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Spr show 09.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tsal84 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, and unlikely ever to be used. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC) UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Eric-holcomb-gov.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Eric-holcomb-gov.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Maherblast (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Indiana doesn't release its images into PD. MB298 (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
I'll reach out to Gov's office to clarify. -maherblast
- Delete per nom. Corky 16:56, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Sheila-oliver-lg.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Sheila-oliver-lg.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Maherblast (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
NJ doesn't release its images. MB298 (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
I'll reach out to Gov's office to clarify. -maherblast — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maherblast (talk • contribs) 21:29, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The metadata specifically says "Images may not be used without permission". Corky 16:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More images of the UK Parliament members
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Both per WP:CSD#G5 (uploads by a block evading sockpuppet) and the valid copyright concerns. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:BaronessmobarikMEP.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
However, the uploader JimmyJoe87 asserted Open Government License, which is an invalid license for such images. Oh, and I emailed them a month ago about this, but I've not yet received their response. One file was deleted per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 March 10#File:EleanorlaingMP.jpg for the same reason; so were such images at Commons per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eleanor-Laing.jpg. If they are considered non-free, those images should be deleted because the non-free images of living persons are disallowed per WP:NFC#UUI. --George Ho (talk) 22:53, 1 April 2018 (UTC)All photographs of individual MPs and Peers on the biographical pages and Committee pages are the exclusive property of Dods and are protected under international copyright laws. The photographs may not be reproduced, copied, stored or manipulated in any form without the written permission of Dods unless for non-commercial purposes, provided permission is sought beforehand and the photo is credited.
- George Ho, as I stated months ago when you unsuccessfully tried to have multiple images of mine deleted, why do you not email the House of Lords or House of Commons directly and ask them about the images or email the peers and MPs in question to ask them about the said pictures. Furthermore when you say that the Open Government Licence is invalid for these images, I should also point out that you were incorrect previously, when it came to my images, on laws and legislation within the UK relating to images being released. It should be pointed out that the Government has released new Official portraits, which can be seen on their respective wikipedia pages, for many of these people, so I have no problem with many of these images being deleted and would happily do a speedy deletion for them myself if someone would assist me as I do not know how to. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 11:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- You have been told many times that images from parliament.uk domain are to be treated differently from ones at the domain gov.uk. I guess I'll try to email the webmaster as the Dods editor didn't respond. (Why must anyone directly contact the House of Lords or House of Commons about images of themselves?) --George Ho (talk) 18:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I haven't been told 'many times' i've been told by you, who is an editor who got it wrong multiple times when it came to certain images a couple of months ago. By all means email the the HoL or HoC so that this issue can be sorted out. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 08:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- You have been told many times that images from parliament.uk domain are to be treated differently from ones at the domain gov.uk. I guess I'll try to email the webmaster as the Dods editor didn't respond. (Why must anyone directly contact the House of Lords or House of Commons about images of themselves?) --George Ho (talk) 18:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
I haven't looked into all of the details of this case, but just to note that JimmyJoe87 has now been blocked as the latest in a very long line of socks of Marquis de la Eirron. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Just for an update, the webmaster told me via email to refer to the copyright page, which declares such images as non-free. --George Ho (talk) 21:50, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.