Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 24

< October 23	October 25 >

October 24

File:Padayappa Swing Scene.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — ξ ^xplicit 01:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, no contextual significance given. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me! I think the swing scene is one of the film's most iconic scenes, and it has been supported by this source. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read NFCC#8? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The still represents makes a significant contribution to the article by illustrating the appearance of the titular character in that film and in that particular scene. Its akin to the "Here's Johnny" scene in The Shining, for instance. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 00:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please quote us NFCC#8 and give your justification thereupon. I don't care about Jhonny and his Pappa. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I still think the scene is as iconic as the drum dance in Chandralekha (1948), and the supporting source reads, "The swing scene in Padaiyappa is thought to be legendary today", and there is even an explanation as to what inspired the scene: "The scene [...] was inspired by an incident in Ramayana that has Hanuman fashioning a seat for himself using his tail after being insulted at Ravana’s palace." Kailash29792 (talk) 06:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-read my earlier replies. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ ^xplicit 01:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It seems like the swing scene is one of the main aspects that the movie is identified with. If you google "swing scene in Padayappa", pages discussing the scene in the movie go up to at least page 4 of the results. Because it seems that movie is indeed identified with the scene, the image does seem to meet the NFCC 8 requirement. Viewing the image will increase the readers understanding of the movie and how it is perceived. Rybkovich (talk) 02:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically object to that part per NFCC8; the omission of this image would not be detrimental to the understanding of context. What are we seeing in here that people can't image? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are seeing a still from an image without which the film would not have been as iconic as it is today. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Typo there. What are we seeing in here that people can't imagine? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABS-CBN Sports and Action 2016 logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. This does not meet the threshold of originality in the United States, but there is insufficient information in regards to how it stands in the Philippines. — ξ ^xplicit 01:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free TV station logo being used in ABS-CBN Sports and Action and DWRC-TV. File has a non-free use rationale for the article about the network, but does not have a rationale for the article about the affiliate. File's non-free us in the primary article seems fine as it show the branding of the network itself; non-free use in the affiliate article, however, does not seem appropriate per number 17 of WP:NFC#UUI since affiliate stations are generally considered "child entities" of the network. A logo specific to this particular station, however, would most likely be acceptable. Suggest keep in "ABS-CBN Sports and Action" and remove from "DWRC-TV", unless it possible to convert this to public domain or some other free license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image seems to be simple enough to change the licensing to PD-logo. If not support nom on the keep and remove statement. Salavat (talk) 08:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Commonplace (album) cover art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete second listed file only. — ξ ^xplicit 01:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both files are being used in Commonplace (album). There is a non-free use rationale provided for each files use in the article, but they are quite similar in design, etc. so it's not clear why both are needed per WP:NFCC#3a. There doesn't seem to be any reason why the differences between CD cover art and the CD/DVD covert cannot be explained as needed using text. Suggest keep for "File:ELT Commonplace.jpg" since this appears to be the primary cover for the album, and remove for "File:ELT CommonplaceDVD.jpg" since this is not really needed per WP:NFCC#3a and there is no real discussion of this particular version so it's use appears decorative. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support nom, keep for "File:ELT Commonplace.jpg" and remove for "File:ELT CommonplaceDVD.jpg". Salavat (talk) 08:53, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete second DVD file per nom. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moebiusstrip.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 07:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ITS WET...! OIL PAINTING BY RAJASEKHARAN.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Uploader has verified their identity to OTRS (ticket:2016102610000483). (non-admin closure) Anup [Talk] 10:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be author of the work; but we do not know for sure if it is the same person. They need to verify their identity or at least send a permission-letter. Anup [Talk] 10:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.