Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 20

< November 19	November 21 >

November 20

File:Lisa's Substitute.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically or aiding in educational value but decorative. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alejandro Gortazar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional photo, EXIF credits "Alejandro GortazarPhotography" as the copyright holder, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 06:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The EXIF says something else. --Mhhossein ^talk 03:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AleksandarAlekov.jpg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No educational use. --Mhhossein ^talk 03:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lee Sang-hyeok 2016 Spring.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zero evidence that this was released under a free license. Another wiki is not evidence in any sense of the word. Majora (talk) 07:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:915-yes-fm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. — ξ ^xplicit 03:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as non-free , but only seeing simple geometric elements Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing changed to PD-logo. Discussion should be good to be closed now. Not sure on the ability to transfer to Commons though as the Philippines isn't covered by Commons article on Threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 04:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WHOW-AM logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as non-free but only seeing a text based logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing changed to PD-logo. Discussion should be good to be closed now. Suggest moving image to Commons after closure. Salavat (talk) 04:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Freeform Portland logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only seeing text, Why was this one non-free? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's the logo of the station-- I don't think it's trademarked though. Should I change it to another category? Sorry for the confusion.Drchickenbeer (talk) 20:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing changed to PD-logo. Discussion should be good to be closed now. Suggest moving image to Commons after closure. Salavat (talk) 04:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Midnightlovehires.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only seeing text, Why is this non-free? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file is not beyond threshold of originality and hence is not eligible to be protected by copyright. There are some simple characters and the whole set is also simple enough to be published in PD. --Mhhossein ^talk 03:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Graham Kentsley speaking at Artsloy Festival in Volgograd, 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graham Kentsley speaking at Artsloy Festival in Volgograd, 2014.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

This is non-free image of living public person. There is not obstacles to create free photowork (see WP:NFCC-1). Alex Spade (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Replaceable with free ones! --Mhhossein ^talk 07:11, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Graham Kentsley with Fabian Picardo QC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graham Kentsley with Fabian Picardo QC.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

This is non-free image of living public people. There is not obstacles to create free photowork for Graham Kentsley (see WP:NFCC-1, moreover he was photographed from poor angle). There is free image of Fabian Picardo. Alex Spade (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC) Alex Spade (talk) 12:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Replaceable with free ones. It is certainly not the case where we can use fair-use images. --Mhhossein ^talk 07:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christian McCaffery Stanford.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NC license, erronously tagges as SA.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Sfan00 IMG: There is no NC tag. iFutbol ^{Que tal?} 15:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC) (Spike789)[reply]

Delete No evidence of permission for cc-by-sa-4.0 Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - flickr source states non-commercial. -- Whpq (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Flickr stated that you could use the image only if you give credit to author. iFutbol ^{Que tal?} 20:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Spike789: The page shows a couple of Creative Commons licensing symbols. The circled person means that you must provide attribution which is fine. But the second symbol is a circled $ (dollar sign) with slash through it. That means non-commercial use only which is not okay as the English Wikipedia requires that the image be available for commercial use. If you click on the linked text "Some rights reserved", you will get the licensing page which explains the license in more detail. -- Whpq (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Spike789: There are 7 standard creative commons licenses. We only accept CC-zero, CC-BY and CC-BY-SA, all the CC licenses with NC and/or ND are not suitable for Wikipedia. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:46, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this should just have been speedied as a copyvio. There was really no need for discussion because we don't accept the NC tags. ww2censor (talk) 11:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:F4032.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No EXIF, low resolution, unlikely to be user uploaded. $ɱ$ (talk) · vbm · coi) 16:29, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This low quality image is probably replaceable by higher resolutions ones. --Mhhossein ^talk 03:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Linda1981EmmyStrangeHarvest300dpi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep

Significant portion of photo contains a copyrighted (Emmy) award. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ronhjones: Is Emmy award still protected? --Mhhossein ^talk 03:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some checking, I think you may be correct. I was probably thinking about an oscar. I'll withdraw and close as keep

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Knights & Lords logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep at a reduced size, as non-free logo Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a Flickrwash - image comes from https://www.meetup.com/the-Blue-Suit-Walk/ Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones: Agree with the flickrwashing. I changed it to fair use as it is the logo of the company. Any objections to closing this? --Majora (talk) 19:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will be fine once the reduce bot has finished it off. I'll close this one. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will add Flickr user to bad list. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.