Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 23

< July 22	July 24 >

July 23

File:Elizabeth Christ Trump.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 23:01, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A free image of Elizabeth Christ Trump is available via Wikimedia Commons. MB298 (talk) 01:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MB298: where? Magog the Ogre (t • c) 20:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: It appears on her Wikipedia page, and shows her and her husband (I am editing on mobile now and am too lazy to provide a link). MB298 (talk) 01:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ESC 1964 logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Near identical file at Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Palmeiras logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is apparently "free" on Commons, so the image locally is a duplicate. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about the "freeness" of this logo. The commons lists two different reasons: 1- simple shapes, text (i disagree), and; 2- expired copyright in Brazil (don't know). i can't decide either way, but i would say keep, because it's harmless. --Ben Stone 01:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:CSD#F8. As for the "harmlessness", mentioned by Ben Stone, I am yet to see a harmful file deleted per CSD-F8! They were all harmless. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 09:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Medaile2016.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how this is a self, given it seems to be a coin/medal design. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As the Ertar activities consist mostly of reconstructing incomplete information and artifacts brought from the fantasy world Ertar (in paralel universe) for amusement and study purposes of SF fans, this medal design is my humble work showing the importance of the continued existence of READERCONS (regular meetings of the Light Years Magazine readers and Ertar fans). We believe that in Ertar the 31st anniversary (11111 in binary!) is held quite seriously and this picture is our original idea, how the "real" thing looks like. Erempari. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erempari (talk • contribs) 09:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you also uploaded the image Commons, although with a different license, do you need this copy of the file here on en.wikipedia?
Can you confirm that you personally took the photographs of the three persons?
The image is already published on an external website. And, unfortunately, the GNU and CC free licenses do not seem to exist yet in the Ertar universe, at least the embassy website does not use those licenses. This means that Wikimedia (Commons, if the image is to be there) must receive, from one of the official e-mail addresses publicly associated to the Ertar website, a confirmation of the fact that you (User:Erempari on Wikimedia) are the sole author and copyright owner of this work. Please see Commons:OTRS for more information.

-- Asclepias (talk) 16:27, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:QanaLeaflet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a propaganda sheet, copyright is most likley with the state entity that dropped it. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BrownCanvas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder but the image appears to be a professional PR photo. See [1]. We would need OTRS verification that the uploader is the copyright holder. Whpq (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Miguel Hidalgo mural by Aarón Piña Mora.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mural by artist who died in 2010, I fail to see how this can be freely licensed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vacios oteiza.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No explicit PD indication at source listed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - invalid PD reasoning on the part of the uploader. The lack of an explicit copyright tag does not mean it is public domain. -- Whpq (talk) 13:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zoltan Hajos at the University of Veszprem 1953.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The author given appears in the photograph (no. 1). I wonder if this really is the case. Leyo 21:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

If it is not the author in the photograph (no.1) then please suggest who it is. This way I will be able to finish my search of identity. Greetings from ZGH.