Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 19

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — ξ^xplicit 02:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arms-bark-dag.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kbthompson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File was uploaded as non-free and it has non-free use rationales for the three articles where it being used, but not sure if this satisfies WP:NFCC#1. My understanding is that the heraldic elements in a typical coat of arms are considered to be capable of being recreated as a free equivalent to serve essentially the same encyclopedic purpose. Looking through the old WP:NFCR archives seems to show that the consensus has always been that non-free COAs generally fail NFCC#1. If this is really the case, then all of the COAs used being used in the stand-alone articles for London's boroughs (See List of London boroughs#List of boroughs and local authorities) would also fail NFCC#1 and should be removed, right? -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: I notified the uploader per template instructions, but did not realize until after I posted that they died in 2010. I removed the notification template out of respect since their user talk seems to be being used as a memorial to them, but it's possible they may have also uploaded other similar files for the other boroughs. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This low-resolution copy of the municipal coat of arms is being used for a very limited purpose in each article and is the best way to serve the purpose as used in each article. I don't know of any free images that would serve the purpose as used. It is certainly not interfering with anyone's commercial rights regarding the coat of arms. I am not even convinced that the image isn't free of copyright. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just for reference, the name at the top of this page should be "Files for Discussion", not "File for Deletion". WP:NFCR was merged into FFD a few weeks back and there are still some kinks being worked out with template links, etc. I am not nominating the image for deletion per se, I am only discussing whether it qualifies as non-free per WP:NFCC#1. What matters with respect to NFCC#1 is not whether we know of any free images which exist which would serve the same purpose, but rather whether such a free equivalent could be created. That is what I'm requesting clarification about. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC); [Post Edited by Marchjuly to strikeout comment about NFCR merge and link problem because post was moved to proper page by another editor - 20:47, 20 November 2015 (UTC)][reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musical canine freestyle.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Maryjo313 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused file, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 15:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUSTARD.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Water and Land (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused graph. Kelly ^hi! 16:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerrish-documents-500.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Motorrad-67 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Probably no encyclopedic use. Only used on old userpage. Kelly ^hi! 16:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elizabeth Swann - Turner.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ZoSo of Zeppelin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3 and #8, there is a better image of the character in the infobox and no valid reason has been given for having two images. January (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neurolysis, earlier.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Neurolysis (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Personal photo of long-absent user. Kelly ^hi! 22:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.