Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 May 7

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< May 6 May 8 >

May 7

File:2013WorldSeries.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013WorldSeries.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BBallFan2013 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

LQ, already deleted before, see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 April 21#File:2013 World Series logo.jpg ÆAUSSIEevilÆ 01:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The thread with the image is still up. Did you bother looking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.2.6 (talk) 16:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LEON 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:LEON 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sjhcq (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image, low resolution, unknown source, resolution is web ready, possibly not owned by uploader -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that, but the date from that site is 2010, the image was uploaded here in 2008. That image is larger though. Unknown original source. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The Big Chill film soundtrack artworks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted by User:INeverCry. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vatbg.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fantailfan (contribs | uploads | upload log)
File:Vatbg1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fantailfan (contribs | uploads | upload log)

These images are redundant in The Big Chill (film). The soundtrack is filled with oldies from 1950s and 1960s, so it is not inherently notable and would not be strong as stand-alone. --George Ho (talk) 03:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The bones of Miklabæjar-Sólveig moved to their final resting place.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The bones of Miklabæjar-Sólveig moved to their final resting place.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FASEnska (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC#8: you don't need a photo of the bones hidden in a chest to understand the article. You can't even see the bones on the photo!

PD in Iceland (see Commons:Template:PD-Iceland50) but http://www.skagafjordur.is/displayer.asp?cat_id=1447 doesn't tell whether it is a published photo or not and it doesn't look like a scan of a publication, so the copyright status in the United States is uncertain. USA law requires, amongst other things, that the photo was published somewhere before 1 March 1989. Stefan2 (talk) 13:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Auscoi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Diannaa (talk) 04:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auscoi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bonus bon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Decorative non-free image that adds no meaninful encyclopaedic value to the article and therefore breaches NFCC #8 Spartaz Humbug! 16:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment a picture of the document in the article about the document would seem to be non-decorative (otherwise, we'd delete every book cover, album cover, DVD cover) -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 23:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Interestingly, a similar image File:Us-passport.jpg is on commons as a free image, as is File:Russian ePassport.jpg, and about 100 others. Its use at Certificate of identity was inappropriate, as there was no FUR for use in that article and it has subsequently been removed. I do agree with the IP here, we could probably delete 99.9% of non-free images because they fail NFCC#8. It's a criteria that has to be applied with a modicum of common sense. --AussieLegend (✉) 00:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • The US and Russian passports have licenses that are compatible with commons. Works of the US government are PD and Russian governement works can be reused with attributation. That's not necesserily the case with this and given the cesspit of false licenses and flickr washing that is Commons I wouldn't admit the argument that something is on commons is an indicator that all is well. The image is being used in a gallery for goodness sake so there is absolutely no value having it there and we have historically not permitted gallery use for Non-free images. Also its not being used on an article about itself (like the other images you refer to where at least there is the encyclopaedic value of showing what the subject of the article looks like. NFCC is a foundation mandate that we have to apply correctly, and this isn't it. Spartaz Humbug! 06:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This image would be public domain as too simple to copyright. The Australian coat of arms is public domain due to age (pre 1946 Australia means also public domain in US). The rest of the picture elements are either simple text or simple shapes, so non-free use should not be relevant. The picture itself is encyclopedic, educational and having potential use in an article on these kind of documents. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, image is useful and serves a non-decorative purpose at Australian Certificate of Identity. As Graeme Bartlett has pointed out above, it's even questionable as to whether the image is actually copyrightable at any rate, essentially being a blue piece of paper with a public domain image on it and a few words. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:48, 8 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  • Keep per the IP above. It is an image of a document in an article about the document. We allow articles about paintings to contain an image of the painting, and this seems to be the same situation. If this representation of the coat of arms is in the public domain as User:Graeme Bartlett suggested, it should of course be retagged as PD. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to Commons if everything people say is true. --George Ho (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HKeDOIcover.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for the article about the document. I was unalbe to determine the status of the crest on the document as it is not the official shield of Hong Kong. Diannaa (talk) 04:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:HKeDOIcover.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bonus bon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

decorative non-free image that adds no encyclopaedic value to the article. Breaks NFCC #8 Spartaz Humbug! 16:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The US and Russian passports have licenses that are compatible with commons. Works of the US government are PD and Russian governement works can be reused with attributation. That's not necesserily the case with this and given the cesspit of false licenses and flickr washing that is Commons I wouldn't admit the argument that something is on commons is an indicator that all is well. The image is being used in a gallery for goodness sake so there is absolutely no value having it there and we have historically not permitted gallery use for Non-free images. Also its not being used on an article about itself (like the other images you refer to where at least there is the encyclopaedic value of showing what the subject of the article looks like. NFCC is a foundation mandate that we have to apply correctly, and this isn't it. Spartaz Humbug! 06:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MCA 3rd Year.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MCA 3rd Year.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sumantdiwakar (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No encyclopedic value that I can see. Eeekster (talk) 19:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2013_May_7&oldid=1142631249"