Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 May 1

< April 30	May 2 >

May 1

File:Genetically Modified Tomato.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of this non-free image is not clear; it's not discussed in the article, and it's not even really a scientifically accurate image of how genetic modification works [obviously]. This non-free image use doesn't seem justified. (ESkog)^(Talk) 00:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RLFC Crest New 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:17, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RoadKill.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:20, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rob E Rob.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RobDelany.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 01:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image unorphaned (see Rob Delaney). – Muboshgu (talk) 18:23, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Carr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of no encyclopedic value. There is another image in history, but it was reuploaded under a different name. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:23, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coat-of-Arms Earl of Moray.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving from MFD. Rationale was "it is an incorrectly attributed coat of arms." Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:52, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GuedoirObama.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, permission confirmed. — ξ ^xplicit 01:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of a businessman posing with President Obama during an invitation to the White House. Fails NFCC#8 (not the object of commentary as claimed; visual presence of the image not needed to make the text better understood). No explanation of replaceability criterion. Replaceability is of course likely, since White House events are typically documented by staff photographers under PD-USGov. (Of course, it is not unlikely that this one actually is such a staff photo, but we'd need at least some indication to that effect.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:05, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get a permission for this and change the copyright type. ~ AdvertAdam^on-mobile 17:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I used the OTRS procedures for the copyright permission I received. Although, I'm not sure how to close this deletion request. ~ AdvertAdam^on-mobile 21:19, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phenopicolinic Acid.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, not drawn according to WP:MOSCHEM; replaced by File:Phenopicolinic Acid.svg. Leyo 07:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mexacarbate 2D.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, not drawn according to WP:MOSCHEM; replaced in Mexacarbate. Leyo 07:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete, I replaced it with an SVG. C6541 (T↔C) 00:21, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hemicellulose.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality/pixelated. Leyo 07:54, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons unless there is some better replacement image of this content, we should keep this one. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure if the structure is correct. The uploader obviously didn't insert the image into the article Hemicellulose or in any other article. --Leyo 07:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As long as it is not knowingly wrong, it should be moved to commons. en.wiki isn't the only project that uses Commons. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 03:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cyclic carbonate and allies.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality (low resolution, badJPG), not used in any article and no use foreseeable. Leyo 14:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Herman Hoth.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

nonfree image, we have several free images of this person: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Hermann_Hoth Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A non-free image should be replaced with free images from Commons whenever possible. --Artene50 (talk) 08:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image of a man who is deceased and historical. So keeping it will not harm the copyrights.--Neogeolegend (talk) 17:55, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Given the free alternatives, this image fails all relevant NFCC standards. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kawiil.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 May 9#File:Kawiil.jpg. — ξ ^xplicit 23:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously replaceable, but is it copyrightable? This looks like an artwork but is claimed to be text in the Mayan script... Stefan2 (talk) 19:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I found an image of Mayan name of one Mayan queen. I found it on one page. This is a historical work, because it shows a name of one historical, royal person. I don't know can we replace this image with another.--Mychele Trempetich

Maybe this can be good explanation: "The image is needed to identify the person for educational purposes in an encyclopedia entry and significantly improves the quality of the article".

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Woman in Love 10 by Laura Myntti.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep File:Woman in Love 8 by Laura Myntti.jpg, delete the other two. — ξ ^xplicit 01:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The files fail WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 19:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At least one of the three images should be retained per WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCI#7, since the "Women in Love" works are discussed in the article with critical commentary and their visual style is described by a reliable source. Keeping one of them as representative of the three is supported by policy. I prefer Woman_in_Love_10_by_Laura_Myntti.jpg but any other criteria could be used to choose which one. The gallery format could be changed so that each image is displayed with its own critical commentary, so it's no reason to delete. Diego (talk) 09:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP ALL! These files have been appropriately replaced with smaller or lower quality versions in order to comply with Wikipedia:NFCC. An administrator should please delete the previous versions only. Thank you. —JOHNMOORofMOORLAND (talk) 16:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But you can't use non-free images in galleries. I see that the gallery has been extended by additional images, so those are now up for deletion at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 May 3#File:Self by Laura Myntti.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:28, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These images are artwork of an artist, who is the subject of the article, and cannot "be easily or adequately described by text or individual images". They are used in low resolution and are just six on a single row, and should comply with image use policy. Thank you. —JOHNMOORofMOORLAND (talk) 18:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are six non-free images in a row, so the image use fails WP:NFCC#3a. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited the article to remove the gallery and show each image together with its relevant critical commentary, so the remaining images pass WP:NFCC#3a now. Diego (talk) 19:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ashab ismail 6.jpg + 15 others

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete all. — ξ ^xplicit 23:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user files WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Autumnal Scenery, hand-colored lithograph after Orra White Hitchcock (jpg version).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

jpg version of File:Autumnal Scenery, lithograph after Orra White Hitchcock.tif. No need for two images. tif is better quality Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.