Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 January 1

< December 31	January 2 >

January 1

File:Arkansas Football.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of the helmet (as distinct from the logo) part of this image, the source is given as http://nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/index.htm, which clearly claims copyright for the non-logo parts of it site.
This helmet image can be replaced by a free one taken at any game with a FUR made for the part of the image that is the logo. Mt king ^(edits) 00:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 21:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alabama Football.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of this helmet picture, the logo displayed is not copyrightable as it contains only numbers so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 00:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 21:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Auburn Football.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of this helmet picture, the logo displayed is not copyrightable as it contains only letters so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 00:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 21:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mississippi Football.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of this helmet picture, the logo displayed is not copyrightable as it contains only letters so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 00:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 21:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TexasAMUHelmet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of this helmet picture, the logo displayed is not copyrightable as it contains only letters so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 00:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 21:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mississippi State Football.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of this helmet picture, the logo displayed is not copyrightable as it contains only of a letter a word, and a simple geometric shapes so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 00:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The football helmet is important to help identify the team in line with the intended branding.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is replaceable as per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png. Mt king ^(edits) 21:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penn and Texas A&M.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of this helmets in picture, the logo displayed is not copyrightable as it contains only a letters so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 00:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not satisfy Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. These football helmets are not necessary to identify the bowl game.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nebraska - LSU.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of the helmets (as distinct from the logo) part of this image, the source is given as http://nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/index.htm, which clearly claims copyright for the non-logo parts of it site.
This helmet image can be replaced by a free ones taken at any game with a FUR made for the part of the image that is the logo. Mt king ^(edits) 00:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not satisfy Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. These football helmets are not necessary to identify the bowl game.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penn and LSU.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of the helmets (as distinct from the logo) part of this image, the source is given as http://nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/index.htm, which clearly claims copyright for the non-logo parts of it site.
This helmet image can be replaced by a free ones taken at any game with a FUR made for the part of the image that is the logo. Mt king ^(edits) 00:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not satisfy Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. These football helmets are not necessary to identify the bowl game.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LSU and Texas A&M.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of the helmets (as distinct from the logo) part of this image, the source is given as http://nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/index.htm, which clearly claims copyright for the non-logo parts of it site.
This helmet image can be replaced by a free ones taken at any game with a FUR made for the part of the image that is the logo. Mt king ^(edits) 00:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not satisfy Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. These football helmets are not necessary to identify the bowl game--GrapedApe (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vanderbilt Football 2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute the fair use of this helmet picture, the logo displayed is not copyrightable as it contains only a letter and simple shape so there is no need to use a copyright image when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mt king ^(edits) 00:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RCAF Comet (colour).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This file has apparently had its copyright status changed by the author on Flickr since uploading, as it now displays "© All Rights Reserved" on the Flickr source. As an orphaned, low-quality image I believe this can be deleted and is not needed as fair-use. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there are lots of other Comet images still available that are copyright-free. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 05:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jeremiah Duggan's route.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 02:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Uploader has requested that this file is kept locally.[1] The file is not orphaned.[2] The file is of potential use at Death of Jeremiah Duggan. Thincat (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FlowerPotMen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 07:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comment how doesn't the image of a band at a performance not illustrate the band in question? 76.65.128.132 (talk) 09:44, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That isn't the issue here. Our policy on copyrighted content indicates that pictures used solely for illustrative purposes must be under a free license. Non-free images can only be used in limited circumstances (in short, the image must satisfy criteria that qualify it as irreplaceable by a newly created free image). —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 14:54, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - How can a new free image be created when the band broke up in 1970? 76.65.128.132 (talk) 15:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - The question is this picture necessary on the article about Psychedelic pop? I don't think it is. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 17:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - File:The Bee Gees.png and File:The Beau Brummels - Village of the Giants trailer.jpg could serve as replacements. Both bands are also on that genre list, and both images are free. Therefore I'd have to say that this particular non-free image is not justified in being used in this particular article. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - The Flower Pot Men has no image of the band. 76.65.128.132 (talk) 02:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Planetary nebula NGC7009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of old revision from File:Ngc7009 hst big.jpg. Unused. Bulwersator (talk) 13:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rxn2.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without useful description Bulwersator (talk) 13:59, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Replaced by File:Rxn2.svg. --Leyo 21:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Badwarelogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We have plenty of icons like this already, this one is orphaned and substantially similar to ones already in use. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file has now been un-orphaned. It's referenced at StopBadware. Some anon, in their only edit ever, made major changes to that article months ago, with no edit comment, and nobody noticed. --John Nagle (talk) 20:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I confirmed the prior comment by John Nagle. The icon is now referenced at StopBadware, with a full description of reuse status. File:Badwarelogo.png is aesthetically pleasing and distinctive. Might we keep it? --FeralOink (talk) 12:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to commons as there is no reason for deletion. Local copy will be deleted as duplicate of file from commons (F8) Bulwersator (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:View of Accra Central Business District.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. 7 07:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 17:14, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image: The File:View of Accra Central Business District.jpg is being used in the Wikipedia article Accra in it's (Accra#Economy section) which demonstrates the the Capital City of Ghana's title as an Emerging Economy and as the Worlds Fastest Growing Economy for the year 2011. This reason that I have stated now defeats the claim of: "as the image is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it." from Armbrust. - MarkMysoe (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The file is currently unused. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 12:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yes Armbrust, This file is actually Montreal, Quebec's Central Business District (CBD) not Accra. I had uploaded the image mistaken it for Accra CBD, so this file should now be deleted. - MarkMysoe (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aerial view of Takoradi Port.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 17:14, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image: The File:Aerial view of Takoradi Port.jpg is being used in the Wikipedia article Sekondi-Takoradi and Ghana in it's (Ghana#Economy section) which complements Ghana's biggest Port and as a oil producing country. The Takoradi Port is what the Sekondi-Takoradi is known for and it is the cities major source of income. The image is also complements Ghana as the Worlds Fastest Growing Economy for the year 2011. This reason that I have stated now defeats the claim of: "as the image is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it." from Armbrust. - MarkMysoe (talk) 22:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Offshore platform on-route to final position, Jubilee field.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 17:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image: The File:Offshore platform on-route to final position, Jubilee field.jpg is being used in the Wikipedia articles Ghana (Ghana#Economy section) and Oil reserves in Ghana, as "Ghana is believed to have up to 5 billion barrels (790,000,000 m³) of oil in reserves." and that Ghana holds the world's twenty-fifth largest proven oil reserves. The oil industry is one of Ghana's biggest resources followed by Gas and the well known Cocoa and Gold. The image is also complements Ghana as the Worlds Fastest Growing Economy for the year 2011. This reason that I have stated now defeats the claim of: "as the image is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it." from Armbrust. - MarkMysoe (talk) 22:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that is still simply using the image for illustration. See our policy on non-free content. In order for an image to be used in this sort of context and adhere to policy, it must be available under a free license. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 15:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Image and its use qualify under Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. No free equivalent. The oilfield Offshore platform image is important to help identify Ghana as a oil and natural gas producer in line with the the oil company who own the "Jubilee oil field".--MarkMysoe (talk) 09:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But the image fails WP:NFCC#8, contextual significance. It's inclusion doesn't significantly enhance the readers understanding of the topic and it's omission isn't detrimental to it. It's goal to identify Ghana as a oil and natural gas producer could be conveyed with words alone and this particular picture isn't needed to that. Additionally the article (in which the picture is used) doesn't contain sourced critical commentary about the image. (A non-free image has satisfy all of the criteria and not just one of them.) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 14:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFCC#1 if it's use is to illustrate oil production in Ghana then a free replacement is creatable. Mt king ^(edits) 00:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cargo vessel at Tema Port.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete. Sorry to disappoint, but this image does not pass WP:NFCC. Materialscientist (talk) 03:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 17:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image: The File:Cargo vessel at Tema Port.jpg is being used in the Wikipedia articles Ghana (Ghana#Seaport section) and Tema, as "The port of Tema handles 80% of the nation’s import and export cargo. Most of the country’s chief export, cacao, is shipped from Tema." and that Ghana is the world's second biggest cocoa producer. The port is also what Tema is known for and is the cities biggest source of income and Ghana's industrial capital City. The image is also complements Ghana as the Worlds Fastest Growing Economy for the year 2011. This reason that I have stated now defeats the claim of: "as the image is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it." from Armbrust. - MarkMysoe (talk) 22:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no way that this image passes WP:NFCC criteria #1. There is no reason why an extremely similar image could not be taken and released for free. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per sven. No need for a non-free image --Guerillero | My Talk 05:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MTVXozzy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be useful, invalid FUR. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amtvweatherrooster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not critically discussed. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nagazi 7.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry image that looks like it is uploaded for personal storage purposes. (Cute puppy, though)... Paolo Napolitano 20:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per {{db-f4}}.--GrapedApe (talk) 13:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nagazi 8.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per above Paolo Napolitano 20:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per {{db-f4}}.--GrapedApe (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paint This Town.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.