Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 August 30

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LiveDeadBackCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mudwater (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically, nor needed to understand the subject —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – The back cover of the album, by artist R.D. Thomas, is in fact discussed in the article, in the Artwork section. The image of the back cover is needed to understand the subject, the subject being the back cover itself, including, but not limited to, the top half of the word DEAD spelling ACID. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 02:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Only mentioned briefly in the article. That is not critical discussion in my opinion. --Stefan2 (talk) 08:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The back cover is discussed in the article, therefore the requirement for critical discussion is fulfilled. If you are not satisfied with the text in the article, feel free to expand and improve it, but it is in fact critical discussion. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 12:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The unsourced text reads "The cover art for Live/Dead is by R.D. Thomas. On the original album, the word 'Live' is seen on the front cover, and the word 'Dead' fills the back cover. The word acid is also visible." Fails WP:NFCC#1, replaceable by text. — ξ^xplicit 02:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurosport2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The TV Boy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Eurosport2.png Bulwersator (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurosport2 hd.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The TV Boy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Eurosport2.png Bulwersator (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurosport news.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The TV Boy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Eurosport2.png Bulwersator (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBC logo (pre97).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AlexJ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:BBC_logo_%28pre97%29.svg Bulwersator (talk) 07:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1450cfab.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nathan Williams (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1450cfab.png Bulwersator (talk) 07:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aramex logo pic.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Extremely simple, may be safely deleted as F8 (file is copied to Commons) Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Api logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smallworldsocial (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Extremely simple, may be safely deleted as F8 (file is copied to Commons) Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panupong Chookham in Amazon coffe.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Johntutor9 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Seems to be out of scope: unused and unidentified person. Stefan2 (talk) 08:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otero 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lady Lotus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otero 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lady Lotus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otero 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lady Lotus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otero 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lady Lotus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otero 5.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lady Lotus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europe72Back.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mudwater (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically, nor necessary for understanding. Readers can appreciate that there is an image of ice cream being stamped into someone's forehead without the image and the passage explaining this is unsourced regardless. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – The back cover of the album is in fact discussed in the article, in the "Cover art and packaging" section. The unsourced origin story of the ice cream kid image is only part of the discussion. Another part is that some of the flying ice cream spells LIVE. The inclusion of the image helps the readers' understanding of this. Merely describing an image is not as effective as including it. Having the back cover of the album included in the article does not violate fair use. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 03:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Let me see if I understand this correctly. We have an unsourced statement on the article that attempts to explain this image. Not reliably sourced critical commentary as required, but a description that, without a reliable source to verify it, is no better or worse than any other description that I might be able to come up with as an origin story. And lastly, the person advocating "keep" above has added their own original research regarding the ice cream's allegedly spelling out words. Sorry, I don't see it, and even so, it's still not acceptable without a source. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The image has to support the text. However, it appears to be the other way around: the text only seems to be there to explain the image. Besides, there is no critical sourced commentary of the image. Lots of ^{[citation needed]} everywhere. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply – The only "citations needed" I see are the two for the chart listings. Also there's a "ref improve" tag that was added to the top of the article yesterday, and I'm not exactly clear why. None of these tags relate to the back album cover. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 21:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • You do realize how weak of an argument that is, right? Basically, what you're saying is that since most of the remainder of the article also lacks sources, you should have a free pass to also introduce unsourced material. No way. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:35, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that the article having "citation needed" tags that are unrelated to the image is not a valid reason for removing the image. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 11:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shauri3.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shauri (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned file, user not active since 2005. JJ98 (Talk / Contribs) 09:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arsine structure.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thatoneguy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Poor quality, orphaned, replaced by much better alternative in Arsine. Leyo 09:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SkeletonsFromTheClosetBackCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mudwater (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Although this was discussed in the article, the passage was unsourced speculation, so that was removed as well as its use in Skeletons from the Closet: The Best of Grateful Dead —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Only part of what the article said about the back album cover was unsourced speculation. I've restored the image to the article, along with a reworked version of the text that omits the speculative elements. Note also that the artist is himself notable and he has his own Wikipedia article. This image is much more significant than a run of the mill back cover, and its inclusion in the article does not violate fair use. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 03:15, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Back cover not discussed critically. It is only mentioned briefly. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:General reaction of the oxidative deamination of an amine, catalyzed by a monoamine oxidase.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gabethenerd (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Poor quality (badJPG), orphaned. Leyo 09:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004QuarterPoppy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Clbw (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Pink Ribbon Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:2006QuarterBravery.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Clbw (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Remembrance Day 90th anniversary Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:65th anniversary of World War II Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Apr rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin May rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Jun rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Jul rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Aug rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Sept rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Oct rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Nov rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Dec rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Pride rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Ingenuity rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Natural Legacy rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Celebration rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Wisdom rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Creativity rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Community rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Achievement rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Harmony rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Family rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Freedom rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Canadian 25 cent coin Health rev.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:2007 Curling.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tsumayogi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Wheelchair curling.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ferryhalim (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Biathlon Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:2010 Snowboarding.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ferryhalim (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Freestyle Skiing Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Figure Skating Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Bobsleigh Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Cross Country Skiing Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Men's Ice Hockey Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Cindy Klassen (colour) Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Sledge Hockey Quarter2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ARTEST4ECHO (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Women's Ice Hockey Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Cindy Klassen Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Orca – Colorized Quarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mike.bertrand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

All of these fail WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 10:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• assistance links -

Royal Canadian Mint intellectual property policy: here

WP Commons Canada Policy: [1]

Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 22:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007 Ice Hockey.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tsumayogi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Used in two articles, but fails WP:NFG in both of them and WP:NFCC#10c in one of them. Stefan2 (talk) 10:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• comment - an OTRS ticket is involved here. Before this goes to far, the Ticket needs to be reviewed. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 22:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • A photo of a coin has two copyrights: a photo copyright (owned by the photographer) and a coin photographer (owned by the Canadian government). The OTRS template is placed after the photo licence, so I would assume that it tells that the photographer has agreed to providing the photo under that licence. However, permission is also needed from the Canadian government. An OTRS member might wish to check what the ticket says. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2005 Canadian quarter Year of the Veteran.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Macboy97 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Used in two articles, but fails WP:NFG in both of them and WP:NFCC#10c in one of them. Stefan2 (talk) 10:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saudi troops enter Bahrain.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mohamed CJ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

non-free image used simply to demonstrate that the crossing depicted happened. Can be adequately covered with text alone without significantly impairing reader understanding Peripitus (Talk) 11:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I was just going to nominate the file for deletion for the same reason when I found out that you had placed an {{ffd}} template on the file information page. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NRPSPowerglide.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mudwater (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – but not for the reasons suggested! The fair use rationale for the image -- artwork from an album insert -- is in fact valid, as the image is discussed in the article, in the third paragraph of the "Vintage NRPS: 1969–1982" subsection; it is also discussed, so to speak, in the image caption. That would be all good and well, but the article is not about the album, it's about the band, and so by longstanding practice in articles about albums and bands, the inclusion of the image is not justified. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 03:25, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LiveCowPalaceBonusDisc.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PAIRdoc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--substantially similar to main album cover —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:39, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – This is the album cover image for the bonus disc, not for the main album, and both the bonus disc and the main album are covered by the article. Just as the main album cover uniquely identifies the main album, this image uniquely identifies the bonus disc, and, like any other album cover, is critical to the readers' understanding of the subject. Whether or not it's substantially similar to the main album cover (and it's not) is therefore not relevant here. To have two, and only two, album cover images in this article does not violate fair use, and substantially increases the value of the article for the reader. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 11:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The bonus disc and the main album have almost identical covers. Besides, the bonus disc isn't discussed critically. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply – This is the article about the album, which includes both the main album and the bonus disc. So the album has two covers, the one for the main album and the one for the bonus disc. Critical discussion of the bonus disc album cover is therefore not needed to qualify for fair use in this article -- see my "keep" comment above. For these same reasons, it doesn't matter if the two album covers are completely different or somewhat similar, or even "almost identical", as you think this one is and I don't. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 21:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Um, no. Critical commentary is not needed to include one cover. However, in this case, you are including two covers, which is a different thing. Critical commentary is needed for supporting the use of multiple covers. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Could you please provide a link to the guideline that says that? It seems to me that this is similar to, but not exactly the same as, the case of an album with an alternate cover. In this case, the article is about two very strongly associated albums, the main one and the bonus disc, that each have their own cover. In the other case, alternate covers, which are widely accepted on Wikipedia for use in album articles, one album is known by two (or possibly even more than two) different covers. So I believe that in both cases, including this one, critical commentary on the second cover is not required, because the second cover, like the first, uniquely identifies the album, is extremely useful to the reader, and is not replaceable by text or by a free image. That's definitely fair use, but if there's a Wikipedia guideline against it, I'd like to see it. Thanks. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 00:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WinterlandJune1977CompleteBonus.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PAIRdoc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – This is the album cover image for the bonus disc, not for the main album, and both the bonus disc and the main album are covered by the article. Just as the main album cover uniquely identifies the main album, this image uniquely identifies the bonus disc, and, like any other album cover, is critical to the readers' understanding of the subject. To have two, and only two, album cover images in this article does not violate fair use, and substantially increases the value of the article for the reader. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 11:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is the article about the main album, not the article about the bonus disc. The bonus disc is not discussed critically in the article. For the same reason, there are no scans of the 9 individual discs in the main album. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply – This is the article about the album, which includes both the main album and the bonus disc. The 9 individual discs in the main album do not have separate album covers. So the album has two covers, the one for the main album and the one for the bonus disc. Critical discussion of the bonus disc album cover is therefore not needed to qualify for fair use in this article -- see my "keep" comment above. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 20:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europe72Vol2Back.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PAIRdoc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically, purely ornamental. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 12:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DavesPicks2012BonusDisc.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mudwater (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--there is already an album cover and this is not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – This is the album cover image for the bonus disc, not for the main album, and both the bonus disc and the main album are covered by the article. Just as the main album cover uniquely identifies the main album, this image uniquely identifies the bonus disc, and, like any other album cover, is critical to the readers' understanding of the subject. To have two, and only two, album cover images in this article does not violate fair use, and substantially increases the value of the article for the reader. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 11:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is the article about the main album, not the article about the bonus disc. The bonus disc is not discussed critically in the article. For the same reason, there are no scans of the 3 individual discs in the main album. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply – This is the article about the album, which includes both the main album and the bonus disc. The 3 individual discs in the main album do not have separate album covers. So the album has two covers, the one for the main album and the one for the bonus disc. Critical discussion of the bonus disc album cover is therefore not needed to qualify for fair use in this article -- see my "keep" comment above. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 20:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Susumu84.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Joebatboy03 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused photo of two high school football players, briefly appearing in the Northwest High School (Cincinnati, Ohio) article five years ago. Non-notable players, low quality image. It looks like a scan from a newspaper article or something, but maybe what I'm seeing as halftoning is just bad JPEG artifacts. —Bkell (talk) 16:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KARE logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Leonard23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Replaced by SVG: File:KARE logo.svg Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted as file is now at Commons. Angr (talk) 18:25, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yi Syllabary Chart.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pokajanje (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

May and should be replaced with text. Unused. Bulwersator (talk) 21:55, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete You have to use [[File:Yi Syllabary Chart.svg|2000px]] or the like to view the image. That isn't suitable for most computer screens. Better coded as a wikitable. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Or the reader could open up the full image, and use the up/down and left/right scroll bars like a sensible person? The resolution of the image is a non-issue, even if we come across a third-worlder running Windows 98 on 680x480 display, because internet browsers have had scroll bars since Internet Explorer 1.0. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 07:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to commons I certainly don't have the fonts installed to display the unicode versions. And it is most definitely used. You didn't check "What links here", since it is a direct link for people who can't see the unicode version. -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 05:49, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep seems useful to people who do not have Yi language fonts installed on their computers. Used in Yi script. -Zanhe (talk) 06:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Already used as a backup for a text table in an article. Obviously, there is a reason why the nom's favored replacement format is insufficient, so the rationale for this deletion is faulty. The file needs to stay. VanIsaac_WS^contribs 07:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: For those running machines with Windows 2000 or older, they won't be able to view the Yi script as they do not have Yi Unicode fonts. In lesser developed countries computers running on Windows 98, 2000 and XP are more common than you think. The English Wikipedia caters to all English readers, not only those from the United States and Great Britain, and we can't say when someone from Nigeria or something needs to look up information about the Yi script, for whatever reason. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 07:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Useful for those poor souls who do not have support for Yi script on their computer, and used on the Yi script page as an alternative to the text table. BabelStone (talk) 07:52, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I am the creator of the image. I created it because the characters would not display in my browser. The image is not "unused". It is linked in the article Yi script; directly above the table, there is a link that says "view this table as an image". Pokajanje|Talk 15:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Endel Ruberg film(Kivilo) ceremonial fire.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by EmilAnois (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Purely illustrative, image is not discussed in article. Bulwersator (talk) 22:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:INVITE URS 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CHISTHI.ZA (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused own work. Bulwersator (talk) 22:05, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Dubious own work. No foreseeable use. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:20120822 bap crash.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FudgeFury (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Superfluous to File:Bap no mercy.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 22:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but it is repackage edition cover for the album... Such images are used everywhere such as Sexy, Free & Single, Girls' Generation (2007 album), Pinocchio (album), Lucifer (Shinee album)... Source of album art is here... it still has to be released thru itunes though... FudgeFury^{(talk|sign|contribs)} 22:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:OTV revolutie.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Petru Dimitriu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I'm not sure what you are supposed to learn by seeing this image. The text is not in English so you can't expect people to be able to read it (and it could be transcribed as text anyway). Apart from that, just a man with a microphone and a few other men around him. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am now writing an article that uses that picture. Don't delete it, it is signifficant. -- Petru Dimitriu (talk) 22:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8) Proof of the truth of the facts presented in text" - images are not reliable sources Bulwersator (talk) 22:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at the current version of OTV (Romanian TV station) and do whatever you want with the picture - I don't mind. If you think it's not worth, remove it. You might as well reduce its size. -- Petru Dimitriu (talk) 22:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I had absolutely no idea about how to fill some of those fields in the upload form - when where they introduced? Uploading a file was simple a while ago... -- Petru Dimitriu (talk) 22:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:James Averis 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Warbo5 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10a. I'm not sure how this is supposed to help me understanding the topic any better. Stefan2 (talk) 23:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krishnath College School.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by B. Mandal (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is apparently what the building looks like today. It seems to be more or less identical, so there is no need for an unfree historical image. Definitely replaceable. Stefan2 (talk) 23:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.