Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 March 26

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. NW (Talk) 21:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ClaraMaassCubaStamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Warrah (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Delete: Non-free Cuban postage stamp, copyright for 70 years after the author's death is being used to illustrate the topic in a stamp and the fact the topic was illustrated on a stamp fails WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8. The stamp's existence and its purpose is already perfectly well explained in prose without the necessity of using a non-free image. ww2censor (talk) 04:49, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link to show that this 1951, pre-Revolution stamp is in violation of Cuban copyright law. Thank you. Warrah (talk) 11:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I uploaded the image and posted it in the Clara Maass article. After posting the earlier request, WW2 explained Wikipedia's policy on stamp image usage to me via his talk page. Based on WW2's explanation, I have removed this image from the article. I have no problem in having the file deleted and I apologize for the inconvenience caused by this image upload. Warrah (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. NW (Talk) 21:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meucci.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Scavap (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Delete: Non-free Italian postage stamp, where 70 years pma rule applies, is being used to illustrate the topic in a stamp and the fact the topic was illustrated on a stamp fails WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8. The stamp's existence and its purpose are already perfectly well explained in prose without the necessity of using a non-free image. ww2censor (talk) 04:54, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. NW (Talk) 21:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IBA Golden Jubilee Stamps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jtm97 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Delete: Non-free Pakistan postage stamp, for which 50 years pma rule applies, being used to illustrate the topic in the stamps fails WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8. The stamp's existence and its purpose could be perfectly well explained in prose without the necessity of using a non-free image but there is no commentary of any kind in the prose. ww2censor (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. NW (Talk) 21:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lennart Meri postage stamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Karabinier (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Delete: Non-free Estonian postage stamp being used to illustrate the topic in a stamp Lennart Meri fails WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8. The stamp's existence and its purpose could be perfectly well explained in prose without the necessity of using a non-free image but there is no commentary of any kind and the existing fair-use rationale claims justification in the article Estonia. ww2censor (talk) 05:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FC Dragons Crest 2008.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Keenan_Football_Association (notify | contribs | uploads).

• orphaned, possible copyvio, probably uploaded for inclusion in a now-deleted article Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:28, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Pennsylvania REVERSE W fringe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Littlekneck (notify | contribs | uploads).

• orphaned, we already have File:Flag of Pennsylvania.svg, not sure what this could be used for Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:29, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Figure.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ramster83 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Image that was uploaded by a now "absentee uploader", is of an extremely low resolution, is orphaned, and is unencyclopedic. NW (Talk) 23:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.