Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 July 29

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DesignedforWinXPlogo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Koman90 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• This non-free image is in direct violation of Wikipedia: Non-Free Content Criterion 10 because it lacks source and origin information and does not state why this should be needed in the article in question. In fact, I think this image is not needed at all: This logo and its use is not discussed in the article at all; at least I don't see it. Fleet Command (talk) 09:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I agree, the image is definitely not needed in the article. It's sort of thrown in there, but there is no reference to it other than a caption restating what it is. Additionally, there's already another version of that logo (just the Windows part, not the text) in the article, so this image is violating the minimal usage rule. If it's removed from the article, which it probably should be, it will be in violation of the one-article minimum rule. And it's definitely in violation of the contextual significance rule, considering there is none. GorillaWarfare ^talk 14:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I agree, i was only converting it from PNG to SVG, i honestly don't know why these stickers are depicted as they are self-explanatory Charles E. Keisler (talk), Network+ 04:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I have used it in the WHQL logo kit article. It has immediate relevance there, as the entire article is about these logos. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

• Agree- There seems to be an immediate need for this logo and related ones in WHQL Testing and Windows Logo Kit. These logos do have a relevance there as they are directly related to the processing potential of the PC they are affixed to, the exact process of testing and certification described in the above articles. Charles E. Keisler (talk), Network+ 03:49, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Objection Not only the logo does not have a fair-use rationale for that article, but also fails to comply with WP:NFCC#3a due to presence of File:CertifiedForVistaLogo.gif. Use File:CertifiedForVistaLogo.gif and delete this file. In fact, I'm doing it right now. Fleet Command (talk) 05:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Editworks single.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Craig1632 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Fair-use orphaned image. There is no article on Editworks, therefore the image is unnecessary and against fair use policy. Additionally, there are multiple versions of this file (that I've also nominated for XfD), which violates the minimal use guideline. GorillaWarfare ^talk 14:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EW Tag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Craig1632 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Fair-use orphaned image. There is no article on Editworks, therefore the image is unnecessary and against fair use policy. Additionally, there are multiple versions of this file (that I've also nominated for XfD), which violates the minimal use guideline. GorillaWarfare ^talk 14:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Editwork final linear version.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Craig1632 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Fair-use orphaned image. There is no article on Editworks, therefore the image is unnecessary and against fair use policy. Additionally, there are multiple versions of this file (that I've also nominated for XfD), which violates the minimal use guideline. GorillaWarfare ^talk 14:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joseph Morris.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by TrustTruth (notify | contribs | uploads).

• The reason for this image's was upload in inaccurate. It fails WP:DEL#REASON #6 “Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed.” The image was first added to Morrisite War and other Joseph Morris (Latter Day Saints) articles by TrustTruth (the uploader). However, when attempting to find a source in order to allow a move to common, I found this page. This page pretty convincingly names this image as “Joseph Morris Hunter” killed on May 30, 1864, not the Joseph Morris (Latter Day Saints) of the Morrisite War, who was killed on June 15, 1862. Additionally this verifable image of file: Joseph Morris (Latter Day Saints).jpg was found, was uploaded ,and replaced the uses of this image. This image now has no usages.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 16:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rail Travel Supervisors on the Snowtrain.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dp20 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Adds nothing encyclopedic to the article in which it's used; it's just a group of people having a party and borders on vanity rather than encyclopediarity. Rodhullandemu 23:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.