Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NULlogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DavidLevinson (notify | contribs).

• Higher quality image at File:NUL logo.svg, orphaned image. Mononomic (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Double reaction arrow.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Raeky (notify | contribs).

• Can be (and often is) represented by using <math>\rightleftharpoons</math> instead. Orphaned. Mononomic (talk) 00:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reaction arrow.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Raeky (notify | contribs).

• Can be represented by using <math>\rightarrow</math> instead. Orphaned. Mononomic (talk) 00:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teleprompter.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dhodges (notify | contribs).

• Image is orphaned. Better quality version with similar content at File:Teleprompter schematic.svg. Mononomic (talk) 00:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakira.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by T.Ho (notify | contribs).

• Artistic (one could argue) but is low-quality (JPEG format) and has no foreseeable use on the Wiki. Mononomic (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom. Not being used in any articles anyway. Mattg82 (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rinzai.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by T.Ho (notify | contribs).

• Artistic (one could argue) but is low-quality (JPEG format) and has no foreseeable use on the Wiki. Author's name and date is visible. Mononomic (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Bon Jovi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by T.Ho (notify | contribs).

• Artistic (one could argue) but is low-quality (JPEG format) and has no foreseeable use on the Wiki. Mononomic (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --JaGa^talk 02:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom. Not being used in any articles anyway. Mattg82 (talk) 18:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scorpion.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by T.Ho (notify | contribs).

• Low-quality (JPEG format) and has no foreseeable use on the Wiki. As User:Lupo mentioned (back in 2004!), "this is not a real scorpion ... it should not be used for natural history articles." I'm not seeing the use here. Orphaned. Mononomic (talk) 00:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:A.Schopenhauer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by T.Ho (notify | contribs).

• Artistic (one could argue) but is low-quality (JPEG format) and has no foreseeable use on the Wiki. Orphaned. Mononomic (talk) 00:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CigaretteV-non.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Niteowlneils (notify | contribs).

• Low resolution, orphaned, many suitable replacements that visually portray the subject are plastered all over Cigarette. Mononomic (talk) 00:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Template Clima.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Renato Caniatti (notify | contribs).

• Low quality, unused, no obvious value. JaGa^talk 02:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drowned world tour 2001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Resbusha (notify | contribs).

• (c) press image ( I can see the sequence in Getty images that this photo is from) that they are selling. Image is sourced to a fansite/blog but the actual owner is not identified. As a press image that is for sale, hosting this goes against WP:NFCC#2 Peripitus (Talk) 02:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phil Hartman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FotoPhest (notify | contribs).

• Orphan Sottolacqua (talk) 13:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Water gunBoss.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image (page it was on was CSD advert remoevd). Also poor quality renders it critically low EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 16:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ThatcherBossEquipment.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image (page it was on was CSD advert remoevd). Also poor quality renders it critically low EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 16:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LogSplitterBossEquipment.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image (page it was on was CSD advert remoevd). Also poor quality renders it critically low EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 16:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HammerBossEquip.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image (page it was on was CSD advert removed) also image of low quality to the point of critically low EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 17:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GerneratorBoss.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image (page it was on was CSD advert removed) also image of low quality to the point of critically low EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 17:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snower blower.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image (page it was on was CSD advert removed) also image of low quality to the point of critically low EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 17:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SeederBOSS.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image (page it was on was CSD advert removed) also image of low quality to the point of critically low EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 17:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SignBossEquipment.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned image, blatant advert, no EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 17:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BossEquipmentLogo2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned image, blatant advert, no EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 17:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Big mulcher.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, low quality, low EV Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 17:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oliver best picBOSS.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NCC1701J (notify | contribs).

• Absolutely no EV, orphaned image, poor quality Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 17:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JRT ADV March83.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wtshymanski (notify | contribs).

• Non-free magazine advertisement used in an article that does not discuss the advertisement or the magazine (just the product advertised). Fails WP:NFCC#8. Damiens.rf 17:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional Delete Both no and yes. No, because contrary to the nominator's assertion, the image exactly discusses the advertisement in the magazine and complies with WP:NFCC#8. Yes, because the whole article can be nominated for deletion and this image goes with it. Fleet Command (talk) 09:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Weak Delete Not context-irrelevant, but yes, fails WP:NFCC#8. Fleet Command (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • You've misread my nomination. Images don't discuss anything. Text does. And the article's text does not discuss the image, what would be necessary for WP:NFCC#8 compliance. --Damiens.rf 12:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Hmmm! I think you are right! Still, I think you could have nominated the whole article for deletion. But that's another matter entirely. Changing my vote now. Fleet Command (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indogochild.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Perfectblue97 (notify | contribs).

• Possible violation of the personality rights of the individual pictured. Insinuating that they are an "indigo child" is not something that is referenced by the original image [1] ScienceApologist (talk) 21:11, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frmr Camb Police Bldg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#File:Frmr Camb Police Bldg.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).

• PLEASE DELETE. I have taken an alternate one which has no restrictions. CaribDigita (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are new images I made (without copyright restriction at File:Former Cambridge, MA Department (2009).jpg AND File:Former Cambridge, MA Department entrance (2009).jpg (I forgot the word police in title.) Grrr. CaribDigita (talk) 21:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per G7 To delete the photo that you yourself have uploaded, you should have added {{db-author}} to the top of the page. There was no need to come here. Fleet Command (talk) 22:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept Skier Dude (talk) 08:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lasagna Supreme.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FoxLad (notify | contribs).

• Unneeded file for the Greenwich Pizza article. E Wing (talk) 21:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep To list the file here is totally not merrit. Rather than doing so, the nominator could have just take if off the article which he did. Also, what does he mean "unneeded"? The Lasagna Supreme is one of the foods served in Greenwich Pizza. To add in restaurant-related articles at least one image of a food served in a particular restaurant is necessary as it does contribute a significant illustration on what the article is about. FoxLad (talk) 22:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I disagree. The image does not contribute to the article much at all. It really is unneeded. Does every resturant chain need an image of their version of a common food. Also, the image is of terrible quality. Also, you should not be the one to put the image back in, at least until after this is over. Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 06:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Restaurants are obviously well-known for their foods. Therefore, the idea of adding images of one of their dishes helps readers understand what makes that particular restaurant distinct from others. As for the quality, the image looks as though it was created by cellphone but it probably doesn't look that bad. You know something, Nuclear Lunch Detected, your remarks here sound more like opinion rather than facts. 121.58.216.46 (talk) 10:38, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In articles about companies, it is essential to put images of some of the products and services they provide. As a matter of fact in those televised documentaries about businesses, we get to see a lot of things that makes up those corporations, including their products. FoxLad (talk) 06:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, there is nothing special about the food, it's just clutter. Nuclear Lunch Detected  _Hungry? 08:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the most magnificent lasagne I've ever seen. But it is a photograph of a dish at a notable restaurant, so what's the problem? We should have more good quality illustrations, made by editors taking the trouble to improve the project.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 03:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the main page for these topics (Wikipedia:Files for deletion), files that are so-called redundant don't have to be listed here. It says so at the "What not to list here" list. Anyway, it should be noted the lasagna is a well-known specialty of the chain, especially to those in the Philippines. If you still don't think images of food should be added in restaurant articles, why don't you take a look at KFC, Burger King or Wendy's? FoxLad (talk) 10:14, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - A couple of reasons. It is an example of one of the company's products and is appropriate to include in the article. Second, the nominator has not provided a valid, policy based reason why the image does not meet the standards of inclusion beyond his own opinion of what an article should be. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 15:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Jeremy. No proper reason offered for deletion, no assertion that this photo in any way violates policy; it is self-made so its copyright status is not in doubt. I am at a loss to understand the damage this photo does to the project. However, I would suggest to the person who uploaded it that he upload it as well to Commons, where I am sure it would be welcomed and where public domain photos really should go. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 23:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.