Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/silvereye juveniles" on Wikipedia
- shot was taken in an orchard (thus the OOF netting in the BG) the two juveniles on the left are sharp and clear, the adult is, unfortunately OOF but it...10 KB (1,427 words) - 14:57, 27 February 2023
- BG is netting over a tree to (unsuccesfully) keep them out, this is a juvenile which was being tended by several adults Benjamint444 09:09, 5 May 2007...2 KB (248 words) - 08:49, 11 May 2007
- Comment See also the other nomination by the same uploader: WP:FPC/silvereye juveniles. ~ trialsanderrors 20:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Oppose Image suggests...13 KB (1,907 words) - 09:44, 8 February 2023
- Comment See also the other nomination by the same uploader: WP:FPC/silvereye juveniles. ~ trialsanderrors 20:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Oppose Image suggests...5 KB (51,527 words) - 03:00, 21 February 2017
- don't think juveniles are usually ineligible. Noodle snacks (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2010 (UTC) No, I also do not think that juveniles are ineligible...5 KB (30,592 words) - 07:58, 3 March 2020
- warrant being featured. Stevage 03:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Not promoted MER-C 09:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Japanese...6 KB (60,628 words) - 09:37, 5 March 2017
- a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article...40 KB (4,461 words) - 10:49, 13 March 2023
- a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article...2 KB (95,070 words) - 23:58, 28 February 2017
- peacock feathers[25], some moth display patterns[26], jaguar spots[27], and silvereyes[28]. Hopefully it looks better now. Are the changes acceptable, FunkMonk...175 KB (20,679 words) - 07:53, 9 February 2023