Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Gwen Stefani/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by IMatthew 00:05, 24 August 2009 [1].

List of awards and nominations received by Gwen Stefani

• Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Gwen Stefani/archive1

• Featured list removal candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Gwen Stefani/archive1

Notified: Gary King and WikiProject Rock music

I am nominating this for featured list removal because it has many issues that need to be solved for it to be a part of our collection.

• • After the redesign of the Billboard website, many pages became unreferenced. If someone could find the right links for those pages that are used as references here, that would improve the page a little.
  • The main problem is the count. The lead and the infobox tell us that there are 10 awards won and 25 nominated, but more awards are listed.
  • About 12 of the award sections need referencing and info about them.
  • Sections fifth through the last need better formatting than what it is now.

Crzycheetah 17:34, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Image needs alternative text. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I am also a little worried that some of these awards are bogus, so I really need to see some references.--Crzycheetah 18:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment According to the Featured list sweeps page, this page fails criterion 3b. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • About a week ago, an IP user added a lot of awards see the diff. I am guessing that if/when those awards are formatted and referenced, the list will avoid the 3b criterion.--Crzycheetah 21:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment If the newly added awards are true, they need citing and formatting. But if that were the case, the list did not meet comprehensive by a mile, so should never have been listed. If they are fake, this fails 3b, and can easilly be covered in the main article. Personally, i think many of the new awards are true - she was huge worldwide, so there is no way she was not nominated for more European / Australian / Asian awards, especially the regional MTVs.YobMod 13:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist A late 2008 promotion, this is good in terms of the lead and already-formatted awards, but I think it would be best if this was delisted so someone can do thorough research to make sure this is comprehensive and well-referenced; nobody seems to be working on this. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.