Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the Manhattan Project/archive1

• "2013[1] dollars)" would prefer to see that citation the other side of the closing parenthesis.
  • Me too, but it is generated by the inflation-fn template
• You could link uranium.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• "so a more complex Implosion-type nuclear weapon " no need for "Implosion" to be capitalised.
  • Decapped. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• "Britain and France" shouldn't that really be "Great Britain"?
  • No idea. Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• No need to over link "Einstein-Szilárd letter" and it should have an en-dash (like the first instance).
  • That n-dash subverted the duplicate link checker. Unlinked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• If you link "nuclear fission", perhaps you could link "neutron"?
  • Done. James Chadwick would want it that way. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• " that Uranium 235 is " for consistency, that should be "that uranium-235 is"... please check for others.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Could link "slow neutron".
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• "Rudolph Peierls" Rudolf according to our article.
  • Whoops. Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• "Frisch-Peierls memorandum" needs an en-dash.
  • Ecch. Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• "This is given to..." the memo or the pound of enriched uranium?!
  • The memorandum. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Again, avoid overlinking (e.g. Tizard).
  • Unlinked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't bother linking "research project".
  • Unlinked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• "Video of the Trinity nuclear test." no full stop required.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• " Roosevelt formally authorizes the project." consider reiterating that this is the Manhattan Project he's authorising.
  • Can't say that, because it is not yet the Manhattan Project. Changed to "atomic bomb project". Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Our article on "Stone and Webster" has "Stone & Webster"
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• "July 30, " for consistency, that comma should be a colon.
  • Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• "Aerial view of the Operation Crossroads..." caption doesn't need a full stop.
  • Removed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• There are sometimes more specific articles for military ranks, e.g. Field marshal (United Kingdom) which would be more useful.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• " exploding bridgewire detonators" hyphen needed.
  • Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• "at Alamogordo, New Mexico.[65]." remove spare full stop.
  • Removed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Could link "Potsdam Ultimatum" to the relevant section of the bombings article?
  • No. Linked to its own article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Page ranges in the refs need to use en-dash per WP:DASH.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• You don't need "Science timelines" as a cat since you've got the more refined "Physics timelines".

Otherwise a great (and tragic) read. Thank you for your work and the nomination. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• • All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• 1941-July 2: James Chadwick is not linked.
  • Gasp! Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• 1942-September 23: William R. Purnell is linked to a page that doesn’t exist (perhaps this is okay).
  • Yes, it is okay. WP:REDLINK: Good red links help Wikipedia—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that Wikipedia is far from finished.
• 1943-August 19: Churchill is already linked in 1942.
  • Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• 1943-September 8: Combined Policy Committee is linked to a page that does not exist.
  • This is okay. I will eventually create the article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• 1943-Hanford Site is linked twice.
  • Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• brigadier general is never linked (first use in 1942-September 23), should also be capitalized for consistency
  • WP:MILTERMS: Military ranks follow the same capitalization guidelines as given under Titles of people above. For example, Brigadier General John Smith, but John Smith was a brigadier general.
• First use of Colonel is 1942-September 17 (not linked).
  • Linked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Major General linked in intro, also 1942-August 13.
  • The lead doesn't count. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• First use of General (full) 1945-July 25 not linked.
  • Linked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• 1944-September 2: “Chemists” for “chemists”.
  • Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, well done. -- Godot13 (talk) 04:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for taking the time to review! Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]