Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/PFA Players' Player of the Year

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 18:58, 3 April 2008.

The bare bones of this list was present but I have knocked the table into shape, added references, images, etc. Let me know what you think anyway...... ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - pretty much a support. The only thing I would suggest is changing Association to association in "Voting takes place every spring, with each member of the Association". Peanut4 (talk) 22:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done it :-) ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, though I think TRM's suggestion for the columns is also a good one. Peanut4 (talk) 21:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment as per Peanut4, almost support but would like more than one example of a player saying how prestigious the award is (you say players and there's only Teddy's reference) and I'd also like the Winner by ... tables aligned, columnwise. Otherwise, gets my support. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Will have a look for a second quote. Could you clarify what you mean by "the Winner by ... tables aligned, columnwise".....? ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Think I've got it now....... ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • ...........and I found a second quote too :-) ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - you've dealt with my niggling concerns. Good stuff. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support with comments

• Is "adjudged" a real word?
  • I think so! The Rambling Man (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Since the award is a personal one, rather than team related, I'd rather see the Nationality table before the club table
• There's no need to sort the "Also won" table, because 2002–03, 2003–04 and 2006–07 can only be sorted by the first entry. -- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ• @ 02:06, 25 March, 2008
  • I have moved the table around and made the "also won" column unsortable, per your suggestions. And yes, adjudged is indeed a real word ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Link needed for London, but that's all I can do to comment on. Good work. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Have wikilinked London :-) ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Great work, well done NapHit (talk) 13:20, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Support though my comment on the Winners by... tables at your other FLCs would apply here as well. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • actioned ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.