Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of five-wicket hauls in women's One Day International cricket/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of five-wicket hauls in women's One Day International cricket

Featured list candidates/List of five-wicket hauls in women's One Day International cricket/archive1

Nominator(s): – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another cricket five-wicket hauls list, this time for the women's in the one day format. As always, I am happy to address any and all points raised. Thanks in advance to all reviewers. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from BeatlesLedTV

Would it be possible to put the references in their own column? If so make sure they're centered.

Other than that I got nothing. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BeatlesLedTV, I have rearranged columns in the table and added a separate column for the references. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Awesome. I got no other comments or concerns. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 02:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from ChrisTheDude

"The first two five-wicket hauls in women's ODIs was taken" => were taken

Reworded – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Australia's Tina Macpherson and New Zealand's Glenys Page both achieved the feat as part of their team's victories" => their teams' victories

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"two of only five players to take a five-wicket haul during their ODI debut. The others being" => merge here, as the second sentence is currently not grammatically correct, so "ODI debut, the others being...."

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Despite taking 5/67 off her 10 overs at the County Ground in Taunton during the 2017 Women's Cricket World Cup, the match was lost to Australia" => "Despite Luus taking 5/67 off her 10 overs at the County Ground in Taunton during the 2017 Women's Cricket World Cup, South Africa lost the match to Australia"

Great improvement! Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Shah is also youngest the bowler" => "Shah is also the youngest bowler"

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Players from every the team that currently hold WODI status" => "Players from every team that currently holds WODI status"

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Of the teams that have previously held WODI status only the Netherlands have had a player take five wickets in an innings. No players from teams that no longer play WODIs have achieved the feat" => I don't understand this bit. Is there a difference between no longer holding WODI status and no longer playing WODI matches?

Yes there is. As per the notes after each sentence Denmark, Japan, the Netherlands and Scotland formerly held WODI status but still play cricket while Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Young England and the International XI also formerly held the status but they no compete. All four teams played in the 1973 World Cup and all matches were designated as WODIs. However, players from Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago now play for the West Indies and Young England and the International XI are now defunct. Hope this clears it up. – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Think that's it..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ChrisTheDude, thank you very much for you review. I have addressed your comments above. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to the last point, I note the notes (!) but still don't think the situation is made clear. I would suggest the following re-wording: "Of the teams that are still active but no longer hold WODI status only the Netherlands have had a player take five wickets in an innings.[b] No players from teams that previously competed in WODIs but are no longer active have achieved the feat" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ChrisTheDude, I have made the above change. Thanks again for your review. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I can't see any other issues -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ChrisTheDude, thank you very much for the support. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:56, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Five-para lead breaches WP:LEAD.
I'm sure I saw another women's ODI FLC using the abbreviation WODI...?
" taking 5/67" I think this is the first time you use bowling figures, so perhaps here would be a good place to say "taking figures of 5 wickets for 67 runs (5/67)" and linking figures to Bowling analysis. It's obvious to us, but to our non-cricket readers it's a mystery.
"to achieve the milestone" I think we've lost the focus of "milestone" here, so reiterate "to take a fifer"...
"Lincoln, New Zealand leads " comma after NZ.

Otherwise looks great. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TRM, I have addressed your all comments. Thanks kindly for the review. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:37, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks TRM! – Ianblair23 (talk) 09:37, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support ~~Comments~~ by JennyOz

Hi Ian, that's some list! I only have 3 comments...

Looking at the refs, matches 1 to 17 had various numbers of overs eg 60, 55, 54, 45, 60, 40. Did the 50 become standard around match 18 / 1998? Is it worth a tiny mention?

Note added – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Green - needs dab

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Momoko Saito - needs dab

Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All refs and player links checked. That's it! Regards, JennyOz (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny, thanks for the review. I have addressed your comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ian, just right! Thanks for this maarrvelous list! Happy to sign for support, JennyOz (talk) 07:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenny, thanks for the support. Much appreciated. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:08, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.