Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by The Lego Movie/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by The Lego Movie

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by The Lego Movie/archive1

Nominator(s): Chompy Ace

I am nominating this for featured list because I have expanded and reworked the table at The Lego Movie article and then I provided sources with verdicts for each award in this list. Chompy Ace 13:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Kavyansh

"a 2014 computer-animated adventure comedy film" — Perhaps, avoid linking two or more adjacent words.
"Lord, Miller, and Dan and Kevin Hageman" — is the first "and" necessary?
- Question for you, Kavyansh. If Chompy wanted to emphasize the first two names rather than the last two, how do we write that ... "Dan, Kevin Hageman, Lord and Miller"? But then the readers would have no way of knowing that "Hageman" is Dan's last name (until they read on, and then it's too late). But if "Dan and Kevin Hageman, Lord and Miller" is right, then why should one "and" disappear if we switch the names around? Either the second "and" is necessary or it's not ... it would be better to be consistent ... and it appears to be necessary here. - Dank (push to talk) 16:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't know why there is a need to emphasize the first two names when it is already mentioned that the film was "written and directed by Phil Lord and Christopher Miller" [emphasis added]. So, "from a story by Lord, Miller, Dan and Kevin Hageman" reads fine to me. Moreover, this article already has usage of oxford comma. So not adding a comma in 'Dan and Kevin Hageman' would automatically imply that it is "Dan Hageman and Kevin Hageman". Does that work? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:16, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'll try to raise a discussion on the general question at WT:FLC ... might not work, but it's worth a shot. - Dank (push to talk) 18:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note 1 needs a citation
The image needs ALT text.
That is pretty much all there is to say. Great work!

– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh:

Done for all Chompy Ace 21:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support, all concerns addressed. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

There are some issues with the sorting in the Recipient(s) column. Anything that starts with a quotation mark should ignore that and sort based on the actual first word. And anything that starts with "The" should ignore that and sort on the next word.
That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude:

Done Chompy Ace 09:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - nice one! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

For row scopes, e.g. !scope=row, if the cell spans multiple rows via 'rowspan' then the scope should be changed to use !scope=rowgroup instead.
Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --Pres N 23:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PresN:

Done; I used this table from List of accolades received by Soul (2020 film). Chompy Ace 03:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, rowgroup has been around for a long time, but it only got put on the ACCESS examples last fall, and I only started checking for it in these reviews in the last couple months (so, after Soul was promoted). --Pres N 13:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AK

Disclaimer: I haven't checked references and will be claiming credit at the Wikicup.
"Lord, Miller, Dan and Kevin Hageman" → I think it should be "Lord, Miller, and Dan and Kevin Hageman". The use of the Oxford comma elsewhere means that it isn't really confusing and omitting the first "and" reads weirdly.
"international co-production between the United States, Australia, and Denmark" → This makes it sound like a collab between the countries instead of production houses from those countries.
That's all I could really find. AryKun (talk) 07:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AryKun:

Done Chompy Ace 23:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support on the basis of prose. AryKun (talk) 03:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --Pres N 21:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.