Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Plymouth Argyle F.C. players/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 02:31, 22 October 2010 [1].
List of Plymouth Argyle F.C. players (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Argyle 4 Lifetalk 01:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets FL criteria. There was a sorting issue a couple of weeks ago but it all looks fine now after I included {{Sort}}
in the rows which weren't sorting correctly. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 01:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—no dab links. The external link to http://www.statto.com/football/teams/plymouth-argyle/1964-1965/results returned a "Page not found" message a minute ago, but is now working fine. Ucucha 01:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I'm not sure why it happens but the site has always been working whenever I've visited it. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 11:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - can't see any issues. One suggestion though - since you have appearances as sub as a separate column, is it worth adding a note to the effect that substitutes were not introduced until the 1960s? Just in case people are wondering how come none of the players before then were ever used as a sub.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:50, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point. I'll see what I can do later when I have time to sit down and focus, got to head out in a minute. Thanks for the suggestion. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 11:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Have now added a sentence about the introduction of substitutes to note C. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 12:07, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point. I'll see what I can do later when I have time to sit down and focus, got to head out in a minute. Thanks for the suggestion. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 11:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
Who was the player who took part in the World Cup?
- Added the player in question.
In reference 22, spell out FIFA.
- Done.
What makes http://www.neilbrown.newcastlefans.com/ a reliable source?Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The websites primary source is "The Premier and Football League Player's Records" series of books by Barry Hugman. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 00:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 14:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 14:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments - super mild mind you...
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support in a very good state. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Struway2 (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support. Appears to meet criteria. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
oppose, the table(s) in this article do not meet the requirements of WP:MOS. If you look at WP:Wikitable you'll see that tables are required to use[reply]! scope="row"| and ! scope="col"|
-- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 18:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- This is a new one to me, I must say. First, the table in this list uses column headers, but doesn't use row headers, so I can't see why
! scope="row"|
is relevant. I've looked at the page you link to, and see the method described, but I don't see anything to indicate that page to be part of the Manual of Style. Please could you point out exactly where in the MoS it requires this method to be used. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 19:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Yeah sure its WP:ACCESS#Data table. I didnt know so many people were unaware of the changes so I apologise if its not been made clear. Its a strongly recommended improvement. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.