Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Pakistan women Twenty20 International cricketers/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 19:37, 14 December 2014 [1].

List of Pakistan women Twenty20 International cricketers

Nominator(s): Khadar Khani (talk) 17:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Previously not promoted, I'm nominating this again because I believe this is know according to the FLC criteria. This list was previously reviewed by The Rambling Man, Vensatry, and Vibhijain. The list is based on List of South Africa women Twenty20 International cricketers. As always, your comments and suggestions are appreciated. Regards, --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Meets the standards, very well-referenced. --Carioca (talk) 20:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from —Vensatry _(ping) 08:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from —Vensatry _(ping)

Why fifty-four and not 54?
"she is one of the three batswomen to score a fifty in T20Is for Pakistan". Who are the other two?
Ref #10 is not accessible. Seems like you have mistyped the URL of it.
- This URL is replicated thrice in the article. —Vensatry _(ping) 18:42, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fixed. --Khadar Khani (talk) 22:55, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Maroof and Nain Abidi have taken 17 catches each which are more than any other Pakistani fielder in women's T20I" - comma needed after each.
"with 50—11 catches and 39 stumpings—which are the second highest in women's" -> with 50—11 catches and 39 stumpings—which is the second highest in women's ...
"Since the team was formed" - when was it formed?. Also the lists shows 32 players.
"This list includes all players who have played at least one Twenty20" - should Twenty20 be T20I?
Why have you used present instead of the actual year in the "Last" column?
Why is Batting not linked in key and table?
Batwosman -typo
As I said in my previous review, there should be foot note giving an explanation for batting averages in the lead.
Given that no player has scored a century, do we really need that column?

—Vensatry _(ping) 19:29, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: thanks for the review. I've addressed all of your concerns, take a look now! --Khadar Khani (talk) 22:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support —Vensatry _(ping) 08:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Made a slight ce to remove some redundancies. Another good list. Cowlibob (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 19:37, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.