Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Pakistan women Test cricketers/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 11:58, 19 January 2015 [1].

List of Pakistan women Test cricketers

Featured list candidates/List of Pakistan women Test cricketers/archive1

Nominator(s): Khadar Khani (talk) 13:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another women cricketers' list based on List of Pakistan women Twenty20 International cricketers (an existing FLC which has significant support) and List of South Africa women Test cricketers. I've worked on the list and I believe this is according to the FLC criteria. Constructive comments and suggestion will be appreciated! Regards, Khadar Khani (talk) 13:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. It meets the FLC criteria and it is a well-referenced list. --Carioca (talk) 21:58, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 12:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*should cite page number of the PDF where the relevant info is found.

- Done. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Batool Fatima's caption should probably more descriptive, perhaps highlighting that she has the most dismissals.
- Done. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure we need a separate table for Test Captain as there has only been one.
- Have a look at ESPNcricinfo's page. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Highest total should have "as of 2014".
- Done. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The lead does seem a bit slim, maybe something on the history of the Pakistan Women's cricket team like how the South African article is set out.
- I think the lead is sufficient for a table of this length. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cowlibob (talk) 16:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good now. Cowlibob (talk) 12:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from —Vensatry _(ping)

PDF refs. should have page nos.
- Done. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - There is nothing like page no. 10 in the document. —Vensatry _(ping) 19:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - I don't think the opening sentence is even partly verified by the specified part of the document. —Vensatry _(ping) 17:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - @Vensatry: I think the two references cover the sentence. Lets see what say Harrias, Lugnuts and The Rambling Man? --Khadar Khani (talk) 20:56, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        No just tell me which part of the sentence is verified by ref #2. —Vensatry _(ping) 17:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        "A women's Test match is an international four-innings cricket match held over a maximum of four days between two" teams. --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~"... between two of the leading cricketing nations" would mean that Women's Test Cricket is played between the top two teams~~
~~Have a better caption for the image~~
- Clarified. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~"Batool Fatima holds the record for the most number of dismissals with five" - Is this an overall record or just a Pakistani?~~
- Fixed. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Runs scored per dismissal -> Average runs scored per dismissal~~
- Done. --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not done —Vensatry _(ping) 19:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Why dashes sort (descendeing order) before figures in the Bowling Average column?~~
- So what do you recommend? --Khadar Khani (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

—Vensatry _(ping) 17:48, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: I've fixed your concerns. Please have a look now. --Khadar Khani (talk) 14:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Harrias

;Comments from Harrias ^talk

The dashes sort oddly in the table, sometimes appearing in the middle of the list.
Specifically for the bowling average, the dashes should sort "high", ie the best average (19.00) should be at the top, through to the worst (76.50), and then the dashes, rather than vice versa.
I know it's tough with this sort of list, but the article could possibly do with a couple more references that aren't ESPNcricinfo.

Harrias ^talk 08:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrias: fixed them all. Thanks for the review! --Khadar Khani (talk) 14:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support, nice quick work, thanks. The prose seems a little like a set of facts in bullet point form, but I know it's difficult given that they've only played three matches, and they don't receive a great deal of media coverage. Harrias ^talk 17:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for the support! @Harrias: nice to see a green RC since long! --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, just noticed who you are, the change in signature threw me. Hopefully I'll be around a bit more again now, but we'll see! Harrias ^talk 18:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 12:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.