Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Jennifer Aniston filmography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Jennifer Aniston filmography

Featured list candidates/Jennifer Aniston filmography/archive1

Nominator(s): ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 18:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Aniston is mostly known as the 'Rachel'. She has appeared in many films, telefilms, video games, etc. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 18:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments about the title. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Drive-by comment - there are several films, etc, listed which she directed/produced but did not (as far as I can see) appear in. These are not performances so should not be included -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- ChrisTheDude, renaming the list to Jennifer Aniston filmography would fix the problem? ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, that seems to work for the likes of Ben Affleck filmography, but then he doesn't seen to have done any stage work like Aniston has. So maybe there's no ideal title. But I would say that Jennifer Aniston filmography is probably fractionally more accurate than the current title (IMO, at any rate).......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - ChrisTheDude, Fixed. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 17:48, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - Pinging @WP:FLC director and delegates: note that the name of the review page was just changed. That may screw with the bots, I don't know. - Dank (push to talk) 17:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        Dank it's all good. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        Thanks. - Dank (push to talk) 17:59, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments by LuK3

References should have both the publisher and work parameter along with archived link. For example, for the first reference should have the work as Closer and the publisher as Bauer Media Group.
Year should come before title according to WP:FILMOGRAPHY.
References in the tables should be centered.
I do not think you need to link "Uncredited" to Cameo appearance in the first Film entry. Cameos are usually for "well-known" people and Aniston wasn't well-known at that time.
Reference 22 and 68 should be replaced according to WP:RSP.
Reference 103 should be replaced as well according to Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites#IMDb.
Looks like the Friends: The One with All the Trivia entry under Video games section does not have a reference.

That's it from me for now, great work on the list! -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LuK3, I have fixed all of your comments. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 04:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CAPTAIN MEDUSA, One more minor thing, since you switched the first row, you will have to add !scope="row" to the year column for each entry. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One more comment, I am not seeing both the publisher and work parameters for all of the references. After this is addressed I would be happy to support. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done diff. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support, thank you for addressing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments

"uncredited role of a Dancer in McDonald's" - no reason for capital D on dancer
"a nomination for Best Dance Sequence awarded by MTV Movie & TV Awards" => "a nomination for Best Dance Sequence at the MTV Movie & TV Awards"
"commercially successful films including the Marley & Me" => "commercially successful films including Marley & Me"
"she appeared as a guest star on sitcom Cougar Town" => "she appeared as a guest star on the sitcom Cougar Town"
"she starred in the drama web television series" => "she starred in the web television drama series"
Commercials are listed in the lead but don't appear anywhere in the main article - there should either be an additional table for them or else they should not be in the lead.
Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ChrisTheDude for the comments. I have addressed all of them. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 16:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from User:SNUGGUMS

"doesn't" from "doesn't want to move out" should be "does not" per WP:CONTRACTIONS
The Break-Up only needs to be linked once in lead
Per WP:FILMOGRAPHY, don't include exact episode counts of starring or major recurring roles in TV shows. Season numbers are preferable if it's not a regular role for an entire series.
Not sure whether "MyNorthwest.com" or "AceGamez" are trustworthy references, but I regardless would certainly not recommend using TV.com, BuzzFeed, Metro
Don't italicize CBS News, Rotten Tomatoes, AllMovie (which should have its M capitalized)
"EW.com" should read Entertainment Weekly

We should be set after my above concerns are resolved. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Done everything except italic bit because the template {{Cite web}} automatically adds italic. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could replace "work" or "website" parameters (which automatically italicize text) with "publisher" (which doesn't do so) or add italics around text in the parameter to cancel out its default italicizing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on italics, though you still haven't removed episode counts in the "television" section for main/regular roles (see my prior WP:FILMOGRAPHY comments). SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aaah, sorry about that. Fixed. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can now support following sufficient improvements. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. For a media review, I don't see any licensing problems with File:Jennifer Aniston 2011 (cropped).jpg. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review –

What makes Apple Insider (ref 31) a reliable source? It looks more like a rumor mill than a reliable news source, and I'd think a SAG award wouldn't be hard to find something better for.
All caps in the title of ref 19 should be removed.
Other than those issues, the formatting and reliability of the sourcing look okay. The link-checker tool shows no concerns. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Giants2008: All done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.