Wikipedia:Featured article review/Sarah Trimmer/archive1
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC) [1].
Sarah Trimmer
- WikiProject Biography/Arts and entertainment, WikiProject Children's literature, WikiProject Women's History, WikiProject England, WikiProject Women writers, 2021-03-03 2022-06-23
Review section
I am nominating this featured article for review because there are various statements in the article that are missing citations and may contain original research. I would also like the statement at the top of the Bibliography section to be reevaluated, as possibly removed. The primary author of this article is deceased, and there is not another editor with significant contributions. Z1720 (talk) 13:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The maintenance tags have been addressed. I removed the OR at the top of the Bibliography section. I don't know how we are going to find someone to opine whether all original research has been excised. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, new maintenance tags, unaddressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no major edits to address my concerns. Z1720 (talk) 21:37, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and original research. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Tagged for unsourced statements and original research. DrKay (talk) 09:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no sustained engagement to address concerns. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per Sandy. Hog Farm Talk 13:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: @Caeciliusinhorto: I saw that you resolved some cn concerns earlier this week. Are you interested in addressing the above concerns? Z1720 (talk) 02:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Z1720: I think the original research tag could with some minor rewriting also be sourced to Wills' on the Oeconomy of Charity, but I don't have access to the sources to fix the other cleanup tags (I suspect that the remaining {{cn}} tag could be sourced to Grenby's introduction), and I have neither the knowledge nor frankly the inclination to go over the rest of the text. Unless someone who actually knows what they are talking about and has access to the relevant sources comes forward, I would recommend delisting. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 08:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist: No one had indicated that they would address remaining concerns for this article. Z1720 (talk) 18:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.