Wikipedia:Featured article review/SS Andrea Doria

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 04:27, 7 April 2009 [1].

SS Andrea Doria

Review commentary

Notified: User:Pentawing, User:Vaoverland, WP:SHIPS, WikiProject Shipwrecks, WikiProject Italy, and WikiProject Cape Cod and the Islands

I am nominating this article for a Featured Article Review because the article at present does not meet the Featured Article Critiera, specifically 1c and 2c. There are complete sections that lack any in-line citations, and there are only a total of only 17 in-line cites in the entire article although a plentiful references section is provided. This article's FAC was in August 2005, and as much as I like ships, it does not compare with modern FAs on ships. -MBK₀₀₄ 02:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by Mjroots

OK, not sure if this is the correct procedure, but the GRT varies throughout the article. Infobox states 29,083 GRT, article states 29,100 GRT. I suspect 29,083 GRT is the correct figure, but I'll not alter the article myself as I can't be sure of this as fact. Maybe someone will have the proof and be able to sort this one. Mjroots (talk) 20:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove If I were to reassess this article to the current Ships criteria it would only make a C-class. I placed the refimprove tag last October so there has been plenty of time to resolve this. The lack of inline citations are what is killing this article. --Brad (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not the time for keep/remove declarations. Please see FAR instructions. Joelito (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the fair-use rationales for the images are a little weak given that the article contains free-use images of the sinking. DrKiernan (talk) 12:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations, copyright of images. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 00:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist, the citation issues alone are enough let alone any image copyright concerns. I must say that I am saddened that removing FA is necessary since I am active at WP:SHIPS, but I don't have the reference material to save the article. -MBK₀₀₄ 04:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist, citation issues throughout. Cirt (talk) 17:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist, citations are still lacking. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 02:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.