Wikipedia:Featured article review/Our Gang/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Dana boomer 02:03, 12 December 2010 [1].
Our Gang
Review commentary
Our Gang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: FuriousFreddy, WikiProject Film, WikiProject Comedy, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Comics
I am nominating this featured article for review because this article fails Featured article criteria 1c, as some sections (EX: The sound era and The Little Rascals television package) are unreferenced. GamerPro64 (talk) 17:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Some of the unsourced statements like "comprising shorts (both silent and sound) which have fallen into the public domain." in the section MGM releases are unreferenced.
- Several images, including fair use images like File:Thefirstroundup01.jpg, has no rationale and are not low resolution. Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk) 18:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
| Title: resolved issue |
|---|
Passage from OurGang online - The series, one of the best-known and most successful in cinema history, is noted for showing children behaving in a relatively natural way. While child actors are often groomed to imitate adult acting styles, steal scenes, or deliver "cute" performances, Hal Roach and original director Robert F. McGowan worked to film the unaffected, raw nuances apparent in regular kids. Our Gang also notably put boys, girls, whites, and blacks together in a group as equals, something that "broke new ground," according to film historian Leonard Maltin. Such a thing had never been done before in cinema, but was commonplace after the success of Our Gang. Passage from lead - The series is noted for showing children behaving in a relatively natural way. While child actors are often groomed to imitate adult acting styles, steal scenes, or deliver "cute" performances, Hal Roach and original director Robert F. McGowan worked to film the unaffected, raw nuances apparent in regular children. Our Gang also notably put boys, girls, whites and blacks together in a group as equals, something that "broke new ground," according to film historian Leonard Maltin.[1] Such a thing had never been done before in cinema but was commonplace after the success of Our Gang. Unless of course OurGang online copied wikipedia. It was added here back in 2005. Fainites barleyscribs 22:47, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Is TVShowsOnDVD a reliable source? Overall, I feel the sources are way too thin; most are the same couple books, and the rest are IMDb (which should definitely be replaced if possible) and Snopes (which is fine). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
- Featured article criteria of concern brought up in the review section focused mainly on referencing. Dana boomer (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Per my comments. GamerPro64 (talk) 16:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per GamerPro64 (talk · contribs). Concerns not addressed. JJ98 (Talk) 21:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist – Too much unreferenced content and an excessive number of non-free images. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 03:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per my concerns over sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:43, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.