Wikipedia:Featured article review/Flag of Portugal/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC) [1].

Notified: Parutakupiu, Portugal, WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology, diff for talk page notification May 1

I am nominating this featured article for review because it has a big issue with unsourced content. After removing one patently unreliable source there are now over 20 cn tags, and also unsourced content that's not marked. Hog Farm brought up these issues on talk 2 weeks ago but did not receive a response so here we are. (t · c) buidhe 04:40, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to FARC While there have been a few edits, but the significant work still has to start. FemkeMilene (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to FARC - a little done, but it's largely tapered off and still a lot to do. Also concerned about the reliability of some of the still-present sources, such as the Portugese source "Acção Monárquica Tradicionalista" and I have some doubts about the wargaming site. This needs a lot of sourcing work. Hog Farm _Talk 00:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issues raised in the review section largely concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist, sourcing issues, both in lack of sources and in quality of sources, remain, and would take quite a bit of work to fix. CMD (talk) 03:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist - lots of missing citations, and many of the sources seem to be (per Hog Farm) of questionable reliability. Since work on the article seems to have ceased, I have to support removing the star. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist, I attempted to improve the article, but quite frankly from my attempt to find sources I believe that even finding reliable sources for the currently unreferenced information would require knowledge of Portuguese at the very least. Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist - it looks like the only way this is going to be saveable if is someone who speaks Portuguese comes in and finds/assesses a large number of Portuguese sources, and there's no indication that that event is going to be coming anytime soon. Hog Farm _Talk 22:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.