Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive4
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 16:45, 10 July 2011 [1].
The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured article candidates/The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive1
- Featured article candidates/The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive2
- Featured article candidates/The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive3
- Featured article candidates/The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive4
- Featured article candidates/The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive5
- Featured article candidates/The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive6
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): SCB '92 (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because...the article looks complete; this is currently an A-class, but I think it is good enough to be a featured article SCB '92 (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sequel section is unsourced.
- There is a [citation needed] in Gameplay section.
- Reception section needs to be expanded, as per previous FAC, it talks about it being great, about voice, music, but lacks fundamental features, such as, gameplay (e.g. combat), story, graphics.
- Isn't Plot section a little too long? Surely all the details there are not essential? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 18:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source review - spotchecks not done. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "to create NPCs who could engage in complex activity—such as travelling from town to town every few days or going to church on a certain day—without the chance of execution error." - source?
- "In response to the new content, the ESRB conducted a new review of Oblivion, showing to its reviewers the content originally submitted by Bethesda along with the newly disclosed content." - source?
- "Bethesda Softworks announced in 2010 that they have been developing and will release the next installment of The Elder Scrolls in 2011." - source? Look for other statements requiring sourcing
- Web citations need retrieval dates
- Ref 58, 60: publisher? Check for others
- Ref 73: formatting
- What is AIAS, and why is it bolded?
- Why include the wiki in External links
- See here for a list of potentially problematic links
- What makes this a high-quality reliable source? This? This? This? Nikkimaria (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Oppose and Withdraw - I have seen the history of the article and the nominator has only made one edit to the article. GamerPro64 22:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image Review I resized some stuff, other than that, it's good on images. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.