Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:FALSECON" on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:False consensus (redirect from FALSECON)has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. Shortcut WP:FALSECON...5 KB (703 words) - 03:55, 1 May 2024
- pinging users with prior knowledge of previous stances could result in a WP:FALSECON; as to why I'm not participating as others shouldn't either. Adog104 Talk...22 KB (2,630 words) - 16:24, 9 March 2023
- appear in these recent AfDs but I believe there is a real danger of WP:FALSECON due to an influx of biased or partisan editors. From looking at the archives...38 KB (3,039 words) - 19:03, 28 September 2023
- Theories Noticeboard (diff). Would the result of this CFD count as WP:FALSECON? Probably. -A1candidate (talk) 00:06, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Unlikely. There...682 KB (84,527 words) - 06:14, 21 May 2024
- And there are very valid reasons to suspect sockpuppetry. See: Their WP:FALSECON attempt here and my response here. Examples of them doubling down after...791 KB (108,756 words) - 21:01, 4 February 2023
- 1. Alternative propositions for the second link: WP:CLOSE, WP:POLL, WP:FALSECON. benzband (talk) 10:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC) Support —HueSatLum 13:33, 25...80 KB (5,762 words) - 05:03, 16 December 2023
- pinging users with prior knowledge of previous stances could result in a WP:FALSECON; as to why I'm not participating as others shouldn't either. Adog104 Talk...9 KB (41,531 words) - 13:21, 3 March 2023
- appear in these recent AfDs but I believe there is a real danger of WP:FALSECON due to an influx of biased or partisan editors. From looking at the archives...6 KB (31,522 words) - 15:03, 3 March 2023
- were canvassed here to support - I wonder how that stands in light of WP:FALSECON). --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC) <facepalm> Wow, way to attempt...217 KB (30,000 words) - 12:16, 5 June 2022
- false consensus may be discounted by ArbCom or by other administrators. WP:FALSECON Procedurally flawed consensus A procedurally flawed consensus results from...2 KB (8 words) - 11:13, 18 June 2024
- Meanwhile I will offer the following. 1. Procedural issues, appearance of WP:FALSECON - this was a bit rushed in, and have been multiple over-statements about...148 KB (2,544 words) - 18:44, 9 February 2023
- could be worked out. Buidhe used a false edit summary which claimed WP:FALSECON. Buidhe removed multiple reliable sources from the article. Support for...195 KB (36,866 words) - 07:34, 24 February 2024
- could be worked out. Buidhe used a false edit summary which claimed WP:FALSECON. Buidhe removed multiple reliable sources from the article. Support for...442 KB (800 words) - 18:08, 4 May 2023