Wikipedia:Editor review/Dihydrogen Monoxide

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Dihydrogen Monoxide

Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk · contribs) I'm contemplating adminship at the moment, but I want feedback on me in general first. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 09:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

  • I think you are a good editor, and are friendly and fairly approachable, which is good in an administrator. Your 5 GAs (I only counted 5... am I missing something?) and the 1 FL are good contributions, and I think that this sets you apart as both an administrative type, being a prolific vandal fighter etc., and a good content contributor. I would ask - when were you considering throwing yourself into the battleground that is RFA? -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lol already counting it eh? ;) Well, ok, if you want to go next month, thats your choice. It's up to you. I'll co-nom if you like (someone will have definitely beaten me to the nom proper) -- Anonymous DissidentTalk
  • You're a nice guy, H2O, and I think one day you'll make a good admin. But take it easy, okay? You've had 2 requests (I think) already this year, and imo it's best not to overdo it. You're also very sociable on wiki - which is excellent! - but sometimes I think it's a little OTT, you get me? Anyway, an RFA in a month or two should be fine, so long as you don't do anything daft - like create any dumb templates ;) Kind regards, * Aillema 22:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • You've improved a heap since your G1ggy days, and your contributions to articles are much appreciated. You participate in all areas that future administrators should, and know how everything works, etc. A successful RfA is definitely heading your way soon. I agree with Aillema, humour and socialising is good, but don't go over the top with it. Otherwise, you're a great editor and a valuable asset to the 'pedia and the community. :) Sebi [talk] 08:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with preceding. Also, many folk are quite concerned about privacy - some editors are female (oh really ?!) and others have young kids - so always play safe - easy to be on the safe side here.cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • What was the point of chucking the {npov} label on Music of New Zealand without ANY justification in the Talk page?! Criticism is welcome, but it needs some substance, not random drive-by tagging. ~ Ropata 12:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • H2O, I've known you for a long time, though you've probably never heard of me. Your a great editor. I don't like the way you talk; look at randoms RFA...You get off the point talking about 28% sexier etc...Your perfect but stay on the point. You might want to get an irc client, hydrairc is good, to help you with, ahem, "your work" (That's what it's for but most of the time it's just off-point conversation)--Phoenix 15 18:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ooh boy. Won't you love reliving the experience of RFA water torture? You've already shown yourself to be good from the start, and you've improved even more. Just keep at the pace you're going, and you'll be fine. bibliomaniac15 02:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    My articles - 5 GAs, 6 created, 1 FL.
  3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    The most recent event that caused me stressed (other than the wikibreak ordeal) was the issues surrounding my last RfA. So yeah, I'd like some feedback on how I dealt with that.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Editor_review/Dihydrogen_Monoxide&oldid=1145854283"