Wikipedia:Editor review/Brbigam
Brbigam
Brbigam (talk · contribs) I have been using and editing Wikipedia for several years, and would like to know what kind of Wikipedian I am. I'm still learning how to do certain things like properly citing sources (I understand the idea of citation, but not really how best to do it on Wikipedia.). Most of my edits are correcting typos, reverting vandalism, things like that. I may one day in the future look into becoming an admin, but right now I'm not active enough and have too low of an edit count. Thanks in advance for any help you can give on being a better editor. Brbigam (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Update: I noticed that historically many of my edits did not have edit summaries. This was usually an oversight, and a month ago I turned on the preference to prompt me for edit summaries before saving. Brbigam (talk) 16:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I am glad to have been able to start the Choluteca River article and provide a picture for it, as well as expanding the Choluteca, Choluteca article. I also started the World Gospel Mission article, which has developed into a rather respectable one. I also provided the first picture for Turin Cathedral, although a better one is there now. Most of my edits are fixing typos and reversing vandalism.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I can't think of any real edit conflicts I've been in. The closest I can think of is just that a logo I uploaded was tagged as not having a source cited, and I just fixed it. If I ended up in a conflict, I think I would try to take a deep breath and discuss it on the appropriate talk page, and find as many sources as I could to support my position.