Wikipedia:Drawing board/Archives/2008/March

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. To enter additional comments edit the current main page and link to this page for context if needed.

im a boy and have blonde hair.Check my page im sicho BJ—Preceding unsigned comment added by SichoBJ (talk • contribs) 1 March 2008

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! While we hope that you will enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. If you are looking for friends, you might want to create a page at a service like Myspace, where you may meet more people interested in socializing. If what you are hoping is to become more involved with others who are also interested in contributing to an encylopedia, you might want to look into a WikiProject, where you can meet and collaborate with other users on topics that interest you. For general question on Wikipedia, please check out the help desk. If you decide you'd like to create an article and want more feedback on it, we'd be happy to respond to that here. :) (Remember to sign your notes on all talk pages and discussion boards by typing four tildes (~~~~), which expands in your username and a time stamp. This helps other editors to better communicate with you.) Happy editing. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

River Springs Charter School (text duplicated from [1] without assertion of permission removed.) Riverspringscharter (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and Welcome to Wikipedia. A couple of points to cover here. First, I'm afraid that your username is likely to be problematic. Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading. Usernames that reflect a "real-world" group are particularly likely to be seen as promotional when used to edit articles about said group. It would likely lead to your account being blocked—not to prevent your editing, but to require your re-registering under a name that is consistent with policy. It may be easiest to simply choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines to circumvent this difficulty. If you've already made edits under this account and would like to transfer them to a new account, you can instead request a username change.

Moving on from the username concern, this particular article would be governed by the notability guidelines on companies. There is a proposal to implement a guideline specifically on schools, but this has not yet passed. The rule of thumb under the existing guideline is noting whether the company has received significant or widespread coverage in secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the school (excluding PR releases and information solely available on the school website—these sources may be used for additional information after notability has been established by secondary sources). All material must be attributable. The text as it was placed above did not provide secondary sourcing, without which the article is unlikely to survive a deletion evaluation.

If you are able to assemble necessary sources to assert notability, you may certainly create such an article, although if you are closely associated with the subject, as your current username suggests, our conflict of interest guideline strongly recommends that you do not create or edit the article yourself, but instead consider proposing its creation at requested articles or at a related article or relevant WikiProject. If you do choose to write the article in such a case, you'll want to be particularly careful to approach it neutrally and without undue promotion. The text above would undoubtedly be considered as overly promotional, and I suspect the article would be subjected to deletion as blatant advertising.

Finally, it's also a concern that the text above seemed to have been taken directly from the school's website, which bears a prominent copyright notice. Without a license on the page consistent with GNU Free Documentation License or a letter verifying permission, the article is likely to be either speedily deleted as a copyright violation or listed for administrator action at the copyright problems notice board. It's best either to write the material in your own words or follow one of the following steps:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at the talk page of the article and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License, or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page of the new article with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the talk page of the article.

Please follow all of whichever step you choose. When your e-mail allowing reuse by GFDL is received, a note indicating as much will be placed on the article. (Not infrequently, articles are blanked until permission is received and properly recorded.)

For just some general tips, you might take a look at Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:How to write a great article. Please consider taking a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation.

If you have any questions about any of the above, please feel free to let us know here or to ask more about the policies and guidelines linked here at Wikipedia's help desk, typically manned around the clock by volunteers. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We were the first web site to rent books and audio books online. Like two other online rental services in Wikipedia, Netflix and Gamefly, who rent movies and video games respectively. I would like someone to create a page about Booksfree.com. We launched our site in 2000 and have a very interesting history. We are pioneers in the online book rental service and think like Netflix and Gamefly, that we should be include in Wikipedia. I would prefer an unbiased third party right an article on us. I would be more then happy to supply any facts or details for the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Booksfree (talk • contribs) 19:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for seeking an unbiased party to write the article. That's exactly what's recommended by our conflict of interest guideline, as it helps ensure that Wikipedia remains neutral. While the drawing board is to get advice on articles you plan to write yourself, you can request articles at "requested articles", a process which admittedly can be somewhat slow. You can also seek interested editors at a related article or Wikipedia:WikiProject. Good luck, and happy editing. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah when you search something on google most search results are from wikipedia, but is the information correct? Here in wikipedia anyone can post anything. Is that really good for people? Especially children looking for information for projects? How do you know that the information posted on here is valid???? Well, it might be helpful if the article you are reading has listed sources, as a reference. Or if the article is just reccommending a certain site. I would suggest that you do not use unsourced articles. Who knows a ten year-old could be posting what you are reading??? Wikipedia is not one of the best sites for information, but maybe the best site to state opinions, expierences, or advice. If you are to do that please post that the information is based on PERSONAL views. This article I am writing for you will give you good methods to write/find information on wikipedia. Stay tuned for more article written by me, DDJJmuz, all other articles will include that name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.205.120.188 (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your interest in helping to maintain the quality of Wikipedia's articles and to improve the experience of Wikipedia's users. Let me note that instead of attempting to create a new page on this topic, you may wish to contribute to one of the existing pages. First, there's Reliability of Wikipedia. There's also Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia, and Wikipedia:Verifiability. But I should also note that Wikipedia does not allow opinions, experience or advice, which are all termed under "original research", and any information added to articles as "PERSONAL views" is likely to be swiftly removed by other editors. Finally, we do not sign articles here. Our contributions are acknowledged in the history of every article. Signing articles lends an appearance of ownership, and every article belongs to the community. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to get this bands name out in to the open. The band doesn't yet have the websites and such, but that's why I'm here. I don't know if I can put the bands information on here without internet sources.

The bands name is Chi Roe. They consist of Dylan Pratt on vocals and guitar, Mathew Mueller on the bass, and Jason Mueller on the drums. They've been together for about four, almost five years, and have played in several different shows.

But as of right now, there is no other source to put on here, other then the actual band. Is it possible to still put them on here, that way people who want more information can at least come here to look?

Thanks. Superman1496 (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to the drawing board. I'd have to say it depends on what the band has accomplished. We have specific inclusion criteria for bands, which can be found at WP:BAND. There are currently 12 criteria on that list, but the most commonly used are #1 (significant coverage in reliable, unconnected sources, like newspapers or magazines), #2 (charted hits) & #5 (two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie label). Articles on bands are frequently deleted almost immediately for not indicating that they are encyclopedically important (see WP:CSD#A7 for more about that). You should take a look at the list to see if the band currently qualifies.

If it does, great. The next step would be proving it. Stating that a band meets the criteria, but not demonstrate it through citing verifiable sources may lead to the band's article being put up for deletion debate. The fact that the band doesn't have a website isn't that big a deal, since their website wouldn't be usable anyway (primary sources can't be used to verify notability). What you'd be wanting to here is newspaper or magazine articles, documentation at reliable websites (Billboard; MTV; Rolling Stone; EW Online, etc), stuff like that.

I don't mean to discourage you here. You haven't got to write a perfect article on the band out the gate. :) But you will want to be sure to indicate that the band meets notability and demonstrate that to avoid wasting your time. If this band doesn't qualify now, it might well down the line. If in the meantime you'd like some experience working on music related articles, you might want to check out some of the WikiProjects, like Wikipedia:WikiProject Music, Wikipedia:WikiProject Rock music, Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music or Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums.

If you have more questions about this, please let me know. (I'm sure you realize that the colored text are hyperlinks that will take you to various policies and guidelines.) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all.

I am trying to create a page on Mr. Santidev Ghosh, born 1910, died 1999, but am having difficulty getting Wikipedia to accept the creation, because of me not being very used to this and likely because I am not doing somethign right. As suggested, I created a subpage under tonymitra/Santidev Ghosh, and have copied the same here as follows:

---

This is a work in progress.

Santidev Ghosh, singer, actor, dancer, maestro of Rabindra Sangeet, from Santiniketan, is among the most notable persons that was linked with the Rabidnra Sangeet during the second half of Rabindranath Tagore's life. Santidev Ghosh was, as a teenager, selected by Tagore to be a music teacher in Santiniketan. He was encouraged to act and dance too in the newly formed dance dramas that Tagore was busy creating. Tagore sent Santidev to far corners of India and even to the far east such as Bali, to study and pick up folk and classical dance forms from there and bring them back to Santiniketan for use and further modification and experimentation. Some of the poems of Tagore, to which he later applied tunes and converted them into songs, were first experimented in the voice of Santidev Ghosh. One such song, "Krishnakali", to be sung more like a poem with a tune, sung in one go from start to finish without repeatation of the first two lines, was first presented to the public at Santiniketan through the voice of Santidev Ghosh. He was personally tutored by Rabindranath Tagore as well as Dinendranath Tagore. Santidev Ghosh spent much of his later working life as the head of the department of Sangeet Bhavana, th colelge of Music in Visva Bharati University, at Santiniketan. In fact, his name is already included in the Visva Bharati University page on Wikipedia, in the section "Famous alumni/academics/affiliates".

Kalimohan brought the newly born Santidev, to Santiniketan when he was merely a year old. Santidev lived there for the rest of his life, and died there at a mature age of over 89. When Rabindranath Tagore left Santiniketan for the last time, to be hospitalized in Kolkata, and knew he might not see Santiniektan any more, he wrote a letter to Santidev Ghosh, asking him never to leave Santiniketan for better salaries in the commercial world of music, but to dedicate his life to Santiniketan. Santidev Ghosh obeyed it to his last breath.

---

Early Life

Santidev Ghosh was born on 7 May, 1910 in a village named in the village of Bajapti near Chandpur. At that time, it was part of the British controlled India, and was named the province of East Bengal. Today, it is in Bangladesh.

His father, Kalimohan Ghosh, worked with Rabindranath Tagore from before Santidev Ghosh was born. Originally, Tagore took Kalimohan to work on rural reconstruction programs in the Tagore estates in Silaidah, today's Bangladesh. Later, Kalimohan was brought by Rabindranath Tagore to Santiniketan, to work on similar scheme of rural reconstruction at Sriniketan, adjacent to Santiniketan. Kalimohan brought his six month old son, then named Santimoy Ghosh, to Tagore. Tagore changed the middle part of his name to Santidev. Since then, the eldest son of Kalimohan was known to one and all as Santidev Ghosh.

External Links and references

• Great Masters section on Visva Bharati University official site
• A tribute to Santidev Ghosh
• Govt. of India releases postage Stamp of Santidev Ghosh

---

I would appreciate some help in what else needs to be done for Wikipedia to accept a page on Santidev Ghosh so we could link it with various other pages on Wikipedia where his name already exists without a hot link, and also to gradually improve and fill out the information on Santidev Ghosh's page.

Thanks in advance. Tonymitra (talk) 05:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tonymitra, and welcome to Wikipedia. Establishing new pages can be tricky here, but you seem to be on the right path. There are a couple of issues that I see with the article that might make it difficult to establish. First, the introduction is a little confusing for people who don't know who Rabindranath Tagore was or what Rabindra Sangeet is. (I speak as one of them.) It's always good to make clear who your subject is and why he is important from the start. For instance, while you use the postage stamp release as a reference, you don't mention it within the article. This is probably a lot more valuable to establish Gosh's notability per WP:BIO than some of the background material about how Gosh never looked for better pay in another area. I don't see any mention in your article of the numerous books that this individual evidently wrote. This passage here seems significant enough to bear some mention (although context will be necessary since, again, those unfamiliar will have no idea with a Deshikottama is): "Shantidev was given many awards. He was made Fellow of Sangeet Natak Akademi in 1977. He received the Sureshchandra Memorial Ananda Award in 1980. The Central Government of India conferred him the title of Padmabhusan in 1984. The same year the Vishva Bharati awarded him with its highest title: Deshikottama."

Second, we never reference other Wikipedia articles directly like that. :) The fact that Gosh is mentioned as notable in another article has no bearing on his stand alone article.

I'm going to offer a proposed revision of your opening which is completely composed on the cuff and may reflect some essential misunderstanding of who he is. The point of it is to demonstrate the best way to get the importance established in your lead. The rest of the material currently in your lead should probably be moved to a background section.

Santidev Ghosh (also Shantidev Ghosh) (May 7 1910 - December 2 1999)^[1] was an author, singer, actor, dancer and maestro of Rabindra Sangeet from Santiniketan, India. As a teenager, Ghosh was selected by poet laureate Rabindranath Tagore to be a teacher in Santiniketan and sent across India and even into Bali to further his musical education for that purpose. Tagore also encouraged Gosh to act and dance in the poet-laureate's dance dramas, and some of the poems of Tagore which he converted to songs, such as "Krishnakali", were first presented to the public by Gosh. As an adult, Gosh garnered fame as a teacher and author, producing a number of books including Rabindra-Sangit, Java O Balir Nrityagit, Rabindranather Purnanga Sikshadarse Sangit O Nritya, Rabindra Sangit Vicitra and Rabindra Nrityakala. During his life, he received many awards, including being made Fellow of Sangeet Natak Akademi in 1977, receiving the Sureshchandra Memorial Ananda Award in 1980, receiving the title of Padmabhusan by the Central Government of India in 1984 and, in the same year, the title of Deshikottama, the highest award bestowed by the Visva Bharati. In 2002, India released a postage stamp on Gosh to commemorate his contribution to music. The Minister for Communication and Information Technology noted that Gosh "belonged to that class of musicians who through the ages carried forward music's unique creativity".^[2]

An opening like this will almost certainly survive challenge under WP:CSD#A7. (Note that I've tucked a couple of references in there. To make those show up in your article you need to create a reference section and then tell it to pick those up, by typing something like {{reflist}} under it. Note the curly brackets; they're required.) It would be helpful to explain what some of those honors and awards actually mean. :) It would also be helpful in the body of the article somewhere to talk a little bit more about his books and (based on a quick google search CDs.) Also helpful would be providing a few more references. Up to a certain point, my philosophy is the more the better.

I'd be happy to discuss this with you further here. The main point I'd like to make is that the opening paragraph should make it absolutely clear to people who know nothing about Indian poetry or music that this man is important. More details about his work and history are valuable to the article, but if it doesn't establish importance it may well find itself tagged and deleted because people don't understand it. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Moonriddengirl, that was a great help and my appreciations for the additional references. I thought, once the page is up, I would work on it gradually building it up, but I understand it is better to put enough information up front for the page to be selected. I am still not sure about your comments on how to use the {{reflist}} thing, but intend to play around with it in my subpage and see what it means. I wish I could call someone and sort some of the things out. Anyhow, appreciate your help. I shall rework in and come back here later.Tonymitra (talk) 02:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tonymitra. Glad if it was helpful. In some ways you can call for help, by heading over to the help desk and asking your questions there. You can even ask your question on your user talk page and place {{helpme}} next to it, and a volunteer will make his or her way to you. :) As for {{reflist}}, there's more on how to use reference lists here. Specifically, you might find this section helpful. I myself like to look at examples. Take a glance at the article Juju Music. The reference section at the bottom offers two columns of footnotes. If you open the edit window to look at the source, you'll see {{reflist|2}}. "reflist" tells it to make a list of everything between <ref></ref> tags in the article. "|2" just tells it to do so in two columns. :)

As for your point about gradual creation, Wikipedia does encourage "works in progress", but it is wise to make sure even the most abbreviated articles explain what makes the subject important. Personally, I regard this as step one on any article that I write. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 02:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hi. Once again, thank you so much for helping out. I have redone that page. It is in my subpage at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tonymitra/Santidev_Ghosh

Please tell me if this is good enough for now to be put up, or do I need to have someone else other than yourself to also approve it firs, or do I need to still work on the page more before it is accepted? Once again, thank you for your help.Tonymitra (talk) 03:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry for the delay. We are operating, I believe, in different time zones. :) I think it's a fine start. You need to remove the signature from the bottom (we don't sign pages; what we write, we release by GFDL for all others to work on. We do retain right to authorship credit, but that is found in the article's history. As far as gaining approval, unfortunately it doesn't work that way. There are three steps in the deletion process. The first, speedy deletion,is meant to be used for articles that are clearly inappropriate for Wikipedian in specific ways. The second, "proposed deletion" is meant for uncontroversial deletions of articles that fail to meet policies and guidelines. The third, deletion debate, is for articles the deletion of which will be controversial. Sometimes these become quite heated, and some articles are nominated more than once. I don't think your article is at risk for any of those, but I can't guarantee it, and neither can anyone else.

I'm going to tweak a little bit in your userspace. When you're ready, I think you can move it to article space. I will gladly help with this, if you like. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Fantastic! Yes, I like if you help me. You have been incredibly helpful already. I live in Vancouver, Canada, hence the timing difference. I was born in Santiniketan, the same place where Rabindranath Tagore as well as Santidev Ghosh spent most of their creative life. I noted the work you already did, to clean the page up. Fantastic. How does one "release by GFDL" ? What is GFDL? Please pardon my silly questions, as I am not too familiar with this thing yet. 24.207.44.29 (talk) 14:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) GFDL is the license under which we release our contributions to Wikipedia. It is somewhat similar to releasing it to public domain, in that it allows all material we write here to be used or modified in any way (commercial or otherwise), but it is different in that we retain the right to credit to our contribution. If somebody uses the material without providing that information (many just link to the article on Wikipedia, which satisfies), they are violating our copyright. I'll go and move the article into article space, and we'll see what happens. It should not be speedily deleted. If by chance anyone chooses to nominate it for deletion by the other methods, you will have a couple of days to address it. I'll be watching the article for a while, so I'll be able to contribute to any discussions about that. But if it is nominated, there is a certain protocol for discussing it. I'll point out the guidelines to you if that should become necessary. I hope it won't. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. And my commendations to you for persisting with it through challenges. :) Please take a look at the categories to which it has been added. (See the bottom of the page.) If any of those are inappropriate, they can be removed. If others are also appropriate, they can be added. Let me know if you want to talk about that more. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Thanks again, --Moonriddengirl. Yes, I want to talk about it some more. First, I am amazed at the amount of time you spent on this page, with what must be inscrutable information about an inscrutable place with inscrutable cultural references.

I have several questions, looking forward to improving that page, as well as gather more information for additional pages on related topics, mostly going back to the same place and the same time period (last century - eastern part of India - Bengali Renaissance and the reform movement within the Indian socieity).

1. I did not figure out how you "moved" the article out of my subpage to the main section. I would have created a new page and copy/pasted the information from my sub page.

2. Another question that comes to mind immediately, is, if I want to put supporting reference on some of the information up there on the page on Santidev Ghosh, but the supporting info in not on line, but taken off a printed book, what is the best way to do that ?

I don't know if you will be reading this part. I hope you do. But, if I should take this conversation someplace else, please tell me where.

A last footnote - the people of Santiniketan, and of the University there (Visva Bharati University) and the attached school Patha Bhavana did not have much of an internet access in the past, and are not savvy enough to engage in Wikipedia. As a result, a lot of material on Wikipedia which relate to their rich cultural history is ill-represented on Wikipedia. Some of them are closely watching what is happening to the Santidev Ghosh page. It is my hope that we should be, gradually, get them interested to actively participate, and learn the ropes on how to be good contributors to Wikipedia. For now, they are curious to see how my efforts come out. This very topic is scheduled to be discussed, among other things, in a public meeting in Santiniketan within the next week. I wont be able to attend, but learn the views that come out of it, since it would be recorded.

Again - my sincere thanks to you for taking a special interest in an esoteric subject. Tonymitra (talk) 20:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taken to talk page. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flowforth Productions is a record label and literary publisher, founded in January, 2008, in order to facilitate the joint artistic vision of Daniel Staniforth (Writer/Musician) and Susan Flowers (Graphic Artist). Initial releases include two offerings from Staniforth’s alt-rock project, Luna Trick (Total Submersion and Hoar Frost Sheen), and a collection of electronic classical compositions under his own name (Father to Father).

Visit Flowforth Productions website[2] to learn more about these offerings and other music and literary aspirations from this innovative production team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowforth (talk • contribs) March 20 2008

Hello, and Welcome to Wikipedia! This particular article would be governed by the notability guidelines on companies. The rule of thumb here is noting whether the company has received significant or widespread coverage in secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the company (excluding company PR releases and information solely available on the company website—these sources may be used for additional information after notability has been established by secondary sources). All material must be attributable.

There is, however, a problem in that you have an evident conflict of interest, based on your username. Our conflict of interest guideline strongly recommends that contributors who are closely associated with the subject not create or edit an article on that subject themselves, but instead consider proposing its creation at requested articles or at a related article or relevant WikiProject. For instance, if either of the individuals above meet notability guidelines for people and have articles, you may wish to propose at the talk page of one of them. If you choose to write the article in spite of that strong recommendation that you not, you'll want to be particularly careful to approach it neutrally and without undue promotion. Some of the language in the current example would be problematic. We don't refer to companies as "innovative" unless we are quoting a reliable reviewer. Even if it is not promotional, it may still be tagged with a warning to Wikipedia's readers that its creator has a conflict of interest and may not be neutral through the use of template {{COI}} or {{COI2}}. It is also quite possible that concerns over your conflict of interest will lead to your account under that username being blocked, as it is against our username policy for a username to duplicate a company name, particularly if it is used to promote that company.

If you choose to write the article anyway, Help:Starting a new page should give you all the guidance you need, but you might also look at Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:How to write a great article. Please consider taking a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation.

I would strongly suggest that, instead, if you are able to assemble necessary sources to document notability under the guidelines linked above, you seek assistance in one of the places mentioned. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luna Trick is the creative brainchild of English multi-Instrumentalist, Daniel Staniforth. Classically trained as a Cellist, Staniforth crafts an array of songs styles - ranging from darkwave, electronica, space-funk, ethereal, to more widely experimental. His hybridized guitar style renders many different sonic colors, which are further enhanced by his willingness to explore various instrumentations. Two CDs are scheduled for release from Flowforth Productions in March/April 2008 - Total Submersion and Hoar Frost Sheen. Staniforth also composes ambient, neo-classical, and soundtrack type pieces under his own name.

Visit Flowforth Productions [3] for more information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowforth (talk • contribs) March 20 2008

Please see the above section, particularly as refers to conflict of interest editing. The same obviously applies here.

Otherwise, this individual would be judged for inclusion under the criteria set forth for musicians and ensembles. He would not qualify under album releases and the text above would probably be deleted according to WP:CSD#A7, as a non-notable musician. In order to establish an article about this person on Wikipedia, you will need to be able to verify that he meets one of the other criteria set out there, such as widespread & significant coverage in secondary sources. The language is a little problematic in that we're not supposed to speculate about a subject's "willingness" to do something, although we can report that if a reliable secondary source has declared it. Otherwise, you've done a good job of avoiding promotional language. The article might still be regarded as problematic there because of your interest in the article.

Again, the best thing to do in this case is to request that the article be created at one of the avenues mentioned above. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Main Project:

Luna Trick is the creative brainchild of English multi-Instrumentalist, Daniel Staniforth. Classically trained as a Cellist, Daniel crafts an array of songs styles - ranging from darkwave, electronica, space-funk, ethereal, to more widely experimental. His hybridized guitar style renders many different sonic colors, which are further enhanced by his willingness to explore various instrumentations. Luna Trick CD releases include Total Submersion and Hoar Frost Sheen (both from Flowforth Productions).

Other Projects by Daniel Staniforth:

Jealousy Screams (formerly U.Z.I.) was a San Diego area band from 1985-89. The main components were song-writing duo, Daniel Kennedy (vocals/guitar/synth) and Daniel Staniforth (vocals/guitar/synth/cello), sometimes joined by other musicians such as Mick Macres (drums), Bob Haskins (guitar), and others.

Liar’s Paradise is a collaborative noise/experimental project from the mind of Matt France, founder of Independent Opposition Records. Daniel Staniforth joins Matt and other Cincinnati area musicians for this rather bizarre and mind-boggling compilation that explores a world of paradox and lies.

Dream N (or Dream to the Nth) was a musical collaboration between Daniel Staniforth (Vocals/Guitar) and Jude D’Silva (bass/engineer), recorded near Oxford, OH.

Father to Father is a collection of electronic orchestral pieces, composed and performed by Daniel Staniforth. Although his formal academic training is mostly Literature, Staniforth studied Cello, Piano, Theory, and Composition from an early age, and passed various exams at the Royal Academy of Music in London.

For more information - visit Flowforth Productions[4].—Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowforth (talk • contribs) March 20 2008

This one hints that there may be notability, provided that any of these projects can be documented as meeting the criteria at WP:MUSIC. Phrases like "rather bizarre and mind-boggling" are still problematic with regards to neutrality and suggest original research (which is a catch-all phrase on Wikipedia for many different types of information that can't be attributed to reliable sources.) This is, obviously, another case where WP:COI applies. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RKG Philms is a video company that produces funny and dramatic videos on Youtube. Well know works from the company are boriestas,RKG Guitar Battle, and RKG Sport Skills. This group's location is unknown. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Egnarts001 (talk • contribs) 20 March 2008

RKG Philms is a video company that produces funny and dramatic videos on Youtube. Well know works from the company are boriestas,RKG Guitar Battle, and RKG Sport Skills. This group's location is unknown.

RKG started with Ryan Morris, Gabe Lay, and Kyle Moore. Sadly, Kyle Moore was kicked out and the reason is unknown. Today, Ethan Strange, a.k.a Guelliermo, took the job as a performer and a camera man with good experience. They are creating the new series on Youtubecalled Mountain Doom

The group began in October of 2007 with their first clip of RKG INTRO. Later, they created the series Coke Zero, along with RKG Sport Skills, and their epic boriestas.

A few months later, Ethan Strange came as a guitarist on Creepy Complextion and RKG Guitar Battle. Ethan Strange is supposed to be in the new series of Mountain Doom.

Also coming near the same time as "Mountain Doom", the series called Halo Cops.

Coming in the summer of 2008 THE OKLAHOMA BUTTERKNIFE MASSACRE. Hopefully they will be starting a music carrer and more videos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Egnarts001 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 8 April 2008

Hello, and Welcome to Wikipedia. This particular article would be governed by the notability guidelines on companies. The rule of thumb here is noting whether the company has received significant or widespread coverage in secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the company (excluding company PR releases and information solely available on the company website—these sources may be used for additional information after notability has been established by secondary sources). All material must be attributable. This may be a challenge with a video company that produces on Youtube only, though I'm sure it's not impossible.

If you are able to assemble necessary sources to assert notability, you may certainly create such an article, although if you are closely associated with the subject, our conflict of interest guideline strongly recommends that you do not create or edit the article yourself, but instead consider proposing its creation at requested articles or at a related article or relevant WikiProject. If you do choose to write the article in such a case, you'll want to be particularly careful to approach it neutrally and without undue promotion.

Before establishing the article, please search Wikipedia to make sure that an article does not already exist on the subject. Help:Starting a new page should give you all the guidance you need, but you might also look at Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:How to write a great article. Please consider taking a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation. Good luck, and happy editing. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been deleted last year for lack of contributions. However:

Among the articles from Google one entitled The Particle Technology Forum (PTF) under the auspices of the American Institute of Chemical Engineeres states:

Particle technology is that branch of science and engineering dealing with the production, handling, modification, and use of a wide variety of particulate materials, both wet or dry, in sizes ranging from nanometers to centimeters. Particle technology spans a range of industries to include chemical, petrochemical, agricultural, food, pharmaceuticals, mineral processing, advanced materials, energy, and the environment.

Surely, even though nobody wanted to contribute to an article on this subject over a short time that does not mean to me that we ought not have a short article on WP which tells the reader what it is with a few references, perhaps from Google.LouisBB (talk) 23:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I get 7660 hits for "particle technology" on Google Scholar, including whole books on the topic. Looks good. Also, I don't think an article named "Particle technology" was ever deleted via a deletion discussion. I don't see any deletion discussion named "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Particle technology". The deletion log suggests that such a page was deleted once, but apparently not via a deletion discussion; it was deleted apparently because it only contained one word. So that suggests that you can go ahead and create the article the same as if there had not been any previous deletions. --Coppertwig (talk) 02:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I was trying to create an article under this title I received a warning You are trying to create an article which was once deleted etc, which got me a bit concerned? With your encouragement, Coppertwig, I shall now get back to it asap LouisBB (talk) 22:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw a request to make an article about it, i'm a noob here, so I'm not sure how to make the article. Since it's an up-and-coming game dev team how could I do that? it seems like a good article for me to start with. I found their official webpage [[5]]. LarryPark (talk) 08:33, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heaven Sent Gaming is a Christian game development team, which also music. They are currently an indie team.

• Balance
• Thad's World Destruction
• Holy Word
• Contrast

• Life Never Lost
• Dusk to the Summit

Official Website

Heaven Sent Gaming is a Christian game development team, which also music. They are currently an indie team.

Balance is a puzzle game in development by Heaven Sent Gaming.

Thad's World Destruction is a series of side scrollers in development by Heaven Sent Gaming.

This is a summary of the story

Holy Word is a collection of mini-games in development by Heaven Sent Gaming.

Contrast is an action game in development by Heaven Sent Gaming.

Life Never Lost is a band from Albuquerque, NM.

All We Are is the band's first album.

Dusk to the Summit is a band from Albuquerque, NM.

This Time the Game is Real is the band's first album.

Official Website

LarryPark (talk) 08:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LarryPark, and Welcome to Wikipedia! This particular article would be governed by the notability guidelines on companies. The rule of thumb here is noting whether the company has received significant or widespread coverage in secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the company (excluding company PR releases and information solely available on the company website—these sources may be used for additional information after notability has been established by secondary sources). All material must be attributable.

One problem with both of those versions is that there is nothing in either to indicate that the company is of encyclopedic significance or importance. That could make it subject to speedy deletion under criterion WP:CSD#A7. In creating a new article, you need to set out clearly why this subject should have an article. When doing that with companies, though, you have to guard against going too far in setting out the importance of the company. If you seem to be unduly promotional, the article might instead by tagged for deletion as WP:CSD#G11, advertising.

If on consideration you think the company meets WP:CORP and if you are able to assert significance, you'd probably want to go something closer to the first option, at least to begin with. However, there's plenty of room for more information in the opening paragraph. You could mention where they are headquartered and when they were founded, for instance. Check out Wikipedia:Companies, corporations and economic information for an "infobox" that you might use. You might take a look at another independent development company, like Remedy Entertainment, for some ideas.

Good luck, and happy editing. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ikemefuna Jerome Okani(born May 15 1983, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria), better known as Dollar Man, is a Los Angeles United States based rapper. He came to the United States in early 2002 to study film making and has since completed film school, released a few underground singles and an EP as Ikem Okani prior to his debut full lenghth album "Dollarlogy" on SSC Entertainment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Defriddim (talk • contribs) 26 March 2008

Hi, and Welcome to Wikipedia! :) In order to create an article about that person, you'll need to be able to assert notability per Wikipedia's notability guidelines on musicians, which will mean utilizing reliable secondary sources, like newspaper or magazine articles or professional entertainment websites like ew.com or rollingstone.com. There are specific criteria listed in that notability guideline as to what makes a musician notable enough for an article. The usual rule of thumb is number of releases on notable labels. Dollar Man doesn't seem yet to qualify there (two albums is the threshold), but he may qualify for others, particularly if he has widespread media coverage. An article of this sort would also be covered by Wikipedia's guidelines on "biographies of living persons", which in part urges editors to be extremely careful not to include any information that isn't sourced, even if it's true, and also reminds us that biographies particularly must be written from a neutral point of view.

If you are able to assemble necessary sources and Dollar Man meets the notability requirements, you may choose to create the article yourself, although if you are closely associated with the subject, our conflict of interest guideline urges great caution, particularly with neutrality and not adding information you know to be true but cannot verify. It is strongly recommended that you do not edit an article on a subject with which you have a conflict of interest but instead consider proposing its creation at requested articles or at a related article or relevant WikiProject.

If you choose to create it yourself, once you have registered, please search Wikipedia first to make sure that an article does not already exist on the subject. Currently, there isn't one that I can see...or an article on anyone else named Dollar Man. Because of that, you would not need the parenthetical identification after the name. Those are only used when we have to disambiguate between one article and another. Help:Starting a new page should give you all the guidance you need, but you might also look at Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:How to write a great article. Please consider taking a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Information about copyleft record labels. It would be good to have information about their philosophy and current copyleft record labels. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.43.227 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 26 March 2008

Hello, and Welcome to Wikipedia! That sounds like it could be an interesting article, if you can verify that the topic is of encyclopedic notability by demonstrating widespread coverage in secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the companies that release such records themselves (this would exclude company PR releases and information solely available on copyleft record label websites—these sources may be used for additional information after notability has been established by secondary sources). All articles on Wikipedia are supposed to be written neutrally, but you'd probably want to be particularly careful in doing so here to avoid the appearance of undue promotion. You'll also need to be sure that the current copyleft record labels you're interested in writing about are demonstrably notable enough for inclusion within the article. As part of an article, they don't have to meet notability guidelines for companies by themselves, but I think there is a chance that over emphasis on the companies as opposed to the concept may lead to the article being seen as advertisement, which can lead to speedy deletion.

You might also want to consider creating a section on the topic rather than the article, in which case Copyleft art might be a good place to begin. This is particularly useful if there's not a lot of information currently available. If the section grows large enough, it can be divided out as described at Wikipedia:Summary style. (Note that the current article at Copyleft art does not have any sourcing, unfortunately. If you do choose to add, you should provide sources for the new information, because without sourcing any information is subject to removal from Wikipedia. Sometimes it takes a while. :))

If you choose to create a new article, you will either need to register an account, which has many benefits, including the ability to create articles, or post it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, where other editors will review it to be sure it meets policies and, if so, create it for you. If you don't want to write the article but would just like to suggest it, you can do so at requested articles or at a related article or relevant WikiProject.

Before establishing the new article, please search Wikipedia to make sure that an article does not already exist on the subject. Help:Starting a new page should give you all the guidance you need, but you might also look at Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:How to write a great article. Please consider taking a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation. Good luck, and happy editing. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]