Consensus was not reached, all references check out. Editors confirmed international notability. JazzAficionado22 (talk) 15:42, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After 3 relistings, this AFD didn't have much participation. But I while there were editors confirming some facts about this artist's touring schedule, I saw no one arguing that this article should be Kept so I closed it as Delete. No Consensus would not have been appropriate with no editors arguing to Keep the article. If those editors who commented wanted the article to be Kept, I believe they would have stated this explicitly as they were all veteran editors. FYI, the first AFD was closed as No consensus although there was some support in that discussion to Keep the article that was absent here. LizRead!Talk! 20:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if it is relevant but until last week, JazzAficionado22's username was Kalilw so there might be a COI involved here. But I understand the primary purpose of this review is to examine the closure of the AFD and assess whether or not it was properly done. LizRead!Talk! 20:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. Unlike what is claimed by the DRV nom, a sufficient level of consensus to delete was reached in this WP:UNOPPOSED AfD. —Alalch E. 21:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. Three delete votes and two non-voting comments (one said Kalil was more than a local singer but did not contend notability being met) is clear consensus for a regular delete, it is impractical for this to be closed otherwise and what the DRV filer is asking is unclear. VickKiang(talk) 22:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse as accurate reading of consensus. FrankAnchor 23:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse - There was a rough consensus for deletion, and a rough consensus is a consensus. There was no error by the closer. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:33, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
“rough consensus is a consensus” is not a helpful statement for anyone unsure of the meaning of consensus. Read more at rough consensus and consensus. SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse I also agree, the closer took the right decision with the AfD. Oaktree b (talk) 02:52, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. Correct call of a consensus to delete. There are some very non-independent and very promotional sources, and I can’t find any that would meet the WP:GNG. I think this page was an attempt to use Wikipedia for promotion. Proponents for the article should read WP:COI. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Proponents of which there are/were none except for ex-Kalilw. —Alalch E. 14:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. AfD was an unanimous delete and was correctly closed. Dougal18 (talk) 13:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
