- Nijat Rahimov (actor) (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)
I make this listing on behalf of User:Elshad Iman (Elşad İman), who asked me to do so on my talk page; I expect that he did this because he needed support with the technical process of opening a DRV. The reasoning that Mr İman supplied was:
Trend.az says that the person is from the TOP-10 comedians of Azerbaijan. es-wiki, de-wiki, az-wiki, film-1, film-2, film-3, film-4, film-5, The Azerbaijani actor received the main role of a crime comedy.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 20:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mr İman asserts on my talk page that he has already contacted the deleting sysop. There were in fact several deleting sysops, but I can see from User_talk:BD2412#Nijat_Rahimov_(actor) that he has indeed made a good faith attempt to speak to them.
Although I have opened this DRV, I take no position on it. Please would the closer assess my view as neutral. —S Marshall T/C 09:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, the first deletion (as a redirect from mainspace to draft) and third deletion (of an article containing only {{tempundelete}}) were of course correct. The only deletion of content was the second, Jeepday's G5.I don't see any allegation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sabuhiguseinov064/Archive that the creating user was banned before creating this article; but given that they'd created their supporting socks months before and could just as easily have been discovered and banned just before creating this article instead of just after, I find it difficult to have any sympathy. The article did a much worse job of explaining the subject's notability than Elşad İman does above anyway. —Cryptic 09:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Please restore Draft or main page. Rahimov is a well-known Azerbaijani actor, theater and film actor. TV presenter, member of the famous KVN team "Guys from Baku", TOP-10 comedians of Azerbaijan. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]. It will take a long time to present all the numerous sources. --Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 11:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The article was deleted because the article was created by a sock account. It was not deleted because the subject was not notable. I do not have any problem restoring the article to draft space. You can always create a new draft too. I'm not sure why this was salted. SportingFlyer T·C 12:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @SportingFlyer, If the page was restored, I would make major changes and edit it. If I'm not mistaken, the restoration should have been done by one of the admins, I have no right to restore.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 13:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment to User:SportingFlyer or anyone else - The reason it was salted is straightforward, but is a slight error by the closer that can be corrected. It was salted because it was being repeatedly re-created, which is a good reason to salt. However, it could have been protected as ECP rather than as admin-only, and ECP allows a draft to be created, and reviewed by an AFC reviewer. Some editors routinely salt to admin-only when ECP is sufficient, and in the past that was the only way to salt. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Downgrade protection, and allow re-creation in draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsalt this was salted because it has been repeatedly deleted. There are three deletions in the log, but two of them are purely housekeeping and shouldn't count for these purposes. The other deletion is a G5 deletion which leaves the possibility of someone who isn't banned recreating the article. This would allow the OP (or anyone else) to write a new article at this title. Hut 8.5 11:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsalt and restore/allow re-creation as a draft. I recently edited the Dutch article because it came to TBP (Dutch AfD) for being poorly translated. The subject seems to be notable with the above sources. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 19:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
