Patrick Ayree – Endorsed - this doesn't preclude creating a new article that addresses the issues that lead to deletion, if such a thing is possible. WilyD 00:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC) WilyD 00:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Was not able to defend the page which I created and have new sources that could be used. Only three editors were involved in closing down the page and one of these said that if new sources came to light they may change their decision. Bivaldian (talk) 21:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse but allow recreation - the close was procedurally correct, but you are of course always free to recreate the article if you have additional sources. You may want to use WP:AFC. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse The AfD closure was correct. However, you can recreate the article with additional sources that establish notability of him.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 13:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse, but the appellant appears to agree that the close was correct in October 2020. The article can be re-created, either in article space or in draft. In article space, it may be nominated for deletion if it does not establish general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse correct decision, but new sources doesn't preclude recreation. SportingFlyerT·C 14:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. As a presenter, he will be mentioned in many ghits, and that’s not good enough, and that’s all I see, and you have not given any examples of sources that overcome reason for deletion. If you want to try, draft in userspace or draftspace, and follow the advice in WP:THREE. For drafting, you may request a WP:REFUND of the deleted page. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
