Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 March 11

Ephixa – Allow recreation. The discussion here is a little unusual for DRV. It's not DRV's remit to accept drafts. So, what I'll say here is that the finding of the previous AfD should not be taken as barring a reviewer at WP:AfC from accepting the draft if they find it meets all the usual AfD acceptance criteria. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

The original page (before deletion in 2016) was not very good, so it was deleted. Since then, I had re-made the deleted page as a draft and it may now show enough notability to have a mainspace article. This deletion review was recommenced to me by Robert McClenon, who had declined the article for AfC and instead directed me here. Micro (Talk)

Comment - I have tried to rename this to review the deletion of the article in article space. The draft currently exists and is not up for deletion. I am not !voting to endorse or overturn the deletion at this time. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Accept - The current draft does make the case that the subject satisfies musical notability criteria 2 and 5. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Accept as the subject passes criterion 2 and 5 of WP:MUSICBIO, though I don't know why the chart position mentioned in the draft isn't accurately covered in Criteria 2, as it only explicitly mentions songs and albums. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Accept as per the above criteria in WP:MUSICBIO.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

11 March 2019