Mitchell Mann – The article has been recreated to general agreement, which makes it unnecessary to continue this discussion. If anybody contests the topic's notability, they can nominate the article for deletion again. – Sandstein 10:16, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
I don't think we need to go over Cirt's deletion in 2010. The new information supersedes the previous discussion and we should allow recreation.—S MarshallT/C 22:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Restore and add sources to establish his new status. The old AfD is clearly outdated and has been superseded by events. That said, I'm not sure what the exact best-practice is for Snooker players. I couldn't find much non-trivial coverage, though plenty of sources confirm that he is now a pro, and a comparison with the golf sub guideline suggests that an article might be premature. On the other hand, if the general practice is to include all pro snooker players then he should have an article. In any event, that's an issue for AfD and not here, I just wanted to flag it for Snooker155 or whoever wants to update the article to think about. Eluchil404 (talk) 22:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, pro players get articles, he has also played a few matches as a pro.--Snooker155 (talk) 22:17, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Restore the deletion was right at the time, but there's definitely been a change in circumstances. This is exactly how this is all supposed to work. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Restore or recreate (the latter might be better depending on the usefulness of the deleted article). I don't know anything about the world of snooker and so won't pretend to pass judgement on whether the coverage presented causes the subject to meet the general notability guideline. And DRV isn't the place for that judgement to be passed: as Eluchil404 suggests, there could well be a new AfD after the article is restored or recreated. But what is clear, and sufficient for present purposes, is that things have changed substantially enough that the 2010 AfD no longer applies. --Mkativerata (talk) 09:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just recreate this The deleted content was Mitchell Mann is an amateur snooker player. He won the Junior Pot Black in 2007, beating Jack Lisowski 76-23 in the final. That's no use to you to restart this so just go do it. SpartazHumbug! 11:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks will do that.--Snooker155 (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
Vivek Kumar Pandey – The outcome was snow endorse. Although the discussions were subject to intense, wide-angle sockpuppetry the closers of both discussions rightly saw through this and made the correct determinations. There is no need for good faith editors to waste any more of their volunteering time on Vivek Kumar Pandey. – —S MarshallT/C 11:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
