<biography of living person is available in Wikipedia in large numbers; the authenticity of the genuine purpose for the entry may please be considered ; promoting oneself may be for positive social causes ,instances may be scrutinized applying due discretion > Ajuvr (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your not making any sense, is this a machine translation? Yoenit (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything there as to why we should make an exception for this page and restore it. Wikipedia articles are expected to adopt a neutral point of view on their subjects, which this article didn't do at all. While other articles on similar subjects may exist, this article was not them and Wikipedia makes no guarantee of consistency. Endorse deletion by default. lifebaka++ 14:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
temporarily restored for discussion at Deletion Review DGG ( talk ) 20:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
endorse deletion It was nominated for speedy as A7, no indication of notability. It was deleted, but, correctly, as G11, promotionalism, a better reason because it does look like notability a a journalist was asserted, though it certainly would never pass WP:N. I'd want to see a proper rewrite with good sources before restoring it. DGG ( talk ) 20:55, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
