Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 20" on Wikipedia
- < March 19 Deletion review archives: 2009 March March 21 >...32 KB (2 words) - 17:53, 9 February 2023
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)...15 KB (1,858 words) - 10:20, 18 July 2024
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was Delete. Happy‑melon 16:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)...28 KB (3,033 words) - 19:28, 18 February 2023
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was Delete. Happy‑melon 16:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)...21 KB (2,473 words) - 14:50, 27 December 2023
- deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was Delete --Magioladitis (talk) 00:06, 24 March 2009...6 KB (592 words) - 16:11, 29 March 2022
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC)...9 KB (827 words) - 02:07, 11 February 2023
- 01:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Further comment - I can't actually see any policy reason for this deletion at all Jenuk1985 | Talk 01:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC) As...25 KB (2,922 words) - 07:47, 30 January 2023
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)...13 KB (1,304 words) - 02:07, 11 February 2023
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)...21 KB (2,724 words) - 05:10, 16 May 2022
- nominated for deletion because it creates rationales that may not be specific enough for policy compliance. ViperSnake151 19:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Delete...58 KB (7,599 words) - 18:36, 19 May 2022
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)...23 KB (3,086 words) - 02:07, 11 February 2023
- 21:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom. – sgeureka t•c 09:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Delete -- per nom.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 20:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Delete...8 KB (857 words) - 04:35, 19 February 2023
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 03:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)...9 KB (968 words) - 16:11, 29 March 2022
- deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2009...40 KB (5,205 words) - 03:39, 3 March 2023
- a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was attack page Shii (tock) 08:14, 18 March 2009 (UTC)...11 KB (1,273 words) - 16:11, 29 March 2022
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 23:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)...57 KB (7,504 words) - 08:49, 27 February 2023
- deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 18:22, 4 April 2009 (UTC)...24 KB (2,817 words) - 02:07, 11 February 2023
- –Black Falcon (Talk) 21:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC) Template:Slavery by location (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) This template is rendered...25 KB (3,070 words) - 02:07, 11 February 2023
- in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. — TKD::{talk} 09:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)...21 KB (2,554 words) - 05:10, 16 May 2022
- a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete--Aervanath (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)...40 KB (5,433 words) - 02:07, 11 February 2023
- What is our deletion requirements from the Transwiki space? Bring them here? Best judgement delete? -- billinghurst (talk) 10:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC) There's
- page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was: Delete. - InvisibleSun 22:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC). Article