Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. First version was deleted; this one seems clean. The article needs to verify its notability, but I'm pretty sure it's notable. --Moonriddengirl(talk)13:25, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This page refers to another source which may be a better match than the google books I found, but I have been unable to find that source and the page postdates the article. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Deleted;created a redirect. Pity, but it incorporated content wholesale as well as closely paraphrased with no evidence of permission. --Moonriddengirl(talk)18:39, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Y I'm going to relist this one. The editor who tagged it has been working on it; there are no sources identified, but he had said he would remove the content. I did a scan and did not find copied content in the current version. If this is true next week, the tag should probably be removed with a note inviting the tagger to identify the source if necessary to restore it. --Moonriddengirl(talk)13:03, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Everything has been cleared (including SCV) except this
Listed buildings and structures in Anderton, Lancashire(history · last edit) from various pages in http://lbonline.english-heritage.org.uk/. Not an exact copy - various minor changes but still almost identical text. Site mentions Crown copyright; it is possible that this has been replaced by Open Government Licence, which can be used with Creative Commons according to the FAQ, but situation is unclear (site states that permission is needed, and provides link, but this redirects to a page where only the Open Government Licence, which doesn't require permission, appears to be applicable; the licence mentioned in the terms and conditions appears to have been superseded). If text can be used, attribution, including a link to the licence, would be required. 86.152.209.187 (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
?I can't see this content, which requires a log-in, so I cannot compare the text. I'll bring attention to this one at WT:CP. I'm wrong; it doesn't require log-in, but I have yet to find any of the buildings through their search engine. Maybe somebody can help? --Moonriddengirl(talk)13:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! That's an incredibly frustrating website! Having access now, I have confirmed that the content follows closely. I have reblanked and am relisting to permit the contributor time to address these concerns properly. Previously, he had removed the notice and removed the notice telling him he should not have done so. --Moonriddengirl(talk)14:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
