Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 October 27

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

27 October 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-10-27 Edit

2010-10-27 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Deleted and recreated clean. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Seems to be clean enough. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-old. Will add some more citation templates to my whitelist. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:33, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • I've addressed the concerns at the article's talk page and am relisting this one to allow time for conversation about this specific issue. When it comes back up, I would recommend a summary view to see if there are problems with other sources or in other articles. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I ran this through the copyvio tool and didn't find any other issues. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY I'm afraid that this is not PD based on the disclaimer on their website in which they indicate they are subcontracted by the government and release the content for non-commercial use only. :/ I've blanked and explained and will relist to allow the contributor an opportunity to address the issues. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. So far as I can tell, all the identified content has already been removed. I ran the whole article through several detectors and found only one massive reverse infringement, logged at the article's talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:13, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]